ArticleScience advances2022
Enhanced simulated early 21st century Arctic sea ice loss due to CMIP6 biomass burning emissions.
Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Atlantic multidecadal variability in modulating Arctic sea ice loss and wetting.Science advances · 2026Article
- Stratospheric biomass burning aerosols compensate record-breaking ozone depletion over the Arctic in spring 2020.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Increasing boreal fires reduce future global warming and sea ice loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Confronting Earth System Model trends with observations.Science advances · 2025Review
- Quantifying COScience advances · 2025Article
- Rising atmospheric moisture escalates the future impact of atmospheric rivers in the Antarctic climate system.Communications earth & environment · 2025Article
- Drivers of summer Arctic sea-ice extent at interannual time scale in CMIP6 large ensembles revealed by information flow.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Wide range of possible trajectories of North Atlantic climate in a warming world.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Are Northern Hemisphere boreal forest fires more sensitive to future aerosol mitigation than to greenhouse gas-driven warming?Science advances · 2024Article
- The role of interdecadal climate oscillations in driving Arctic atmospheric river trends.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying decadal variability in Arctic sea ice remain actively debated. Here, we show that variability in boreal biomass burning (BB) emissions strongly influences simulated Arctic sea ice on multidecadal time scales. In particular, we find that a strong acceleration in sea ice decline in the early 21st century in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) is related to increased variability in prescribed BB emissions in the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) through summertime aerosol-cloud interactions. Furthermore, we find that more than half of the reported improvement in sea ice sensitivity to CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.