Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35895474›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2022

Gambling-related harms to concerned significant others: A national Australian prevalence study.

Nerilee Hing, Alex M T Russell, Matthew Browne, Matthew Rockloff, Catherine Tulloch, Vijay Rawat, Nancy Greer, Nicki A Dowling, Stephanie S Merkouris, Daniel L King and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nerilee Hing1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2150-9784
Alex M T Russell1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-7220
Matthew Browne1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-6229
Matthew Rockloff1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-2690
Catherine Tulloch1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2842-5110
Vijay Rawat1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.
Nancy Greer1 Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory, CQUniversity, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6045-1984
Nicki A Dowling2 School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8592-2407
Stephanie S Merkouris2 School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9037-6121
Daniel L King3 College of Education, Psychology & Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-2581
Matthew Stevens4 Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7491-7669
Anne H Salonen5 Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4693-0110
Helen Breen6 Southern Cross University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1350-6129
Linda Woo7 Independent Consultant.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Gambling-related harm to concerned significant others (CSOs) is an important public health issue since it reduces CSOs' health and wellbeing in numerous life domains. This study aimed to 1) estimate the first national prevalence of CSOs harmed by gambling in Australia; 2) identify the characteristics of CSOs most at risk of harm from another person's gambling; 3) compare the types and number of harms experienced by CSOs based on their relationship to the person who gambles; and 4) compare the number of harms experienced by CSOs by self-identified gender. Methods: Based on a national CATI survey weighted to population norms, 11,560 respondents reported whether they had been personally and negatively affected by another person's gambling in the past 12 months; and if so, answered detailed questions about the harms experienced from the person's gambling who had harmed them the most. Results: Past-year prevalence of gambling-related harm to adult Australian CSOs was (6.0%; 95% CI 5.6%-6.5%). CSOs most commonly reported emotional harms, followed by relationship, financial, health and vocational harms, respectively. Former partners reported the most harm, followed by current partners, other family members and non-family members, respectively. Female CSOs were more likely to report more harm and being harmed by a partner or other family member, and male CSOs from a non-family member. Discussion and conclusions: The findings provide new insights into the wider societal burden of gambling and inform measures aimed at reducing harm to CSOs from gambling and supporting them to seek help.

Indexed as

GamblingAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceaffected othersburden of diseaseconcerned significant othersgambling disordergambling harmPGSIproblem gambling

Identifiers

PMID35895474
PMCPMC9295213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.