Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35895230›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2022

Ribosomal RNA-Depletion Provides an Efficient Method for Successful Dual RNA-Seq Expression Profiling of a Marine Sponge Holobiont.

Xueyan Xiang, Davide Poli, Bernard M Degnan, Sandie M Degnan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dual RNA-seq in filarial nematodes andFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xueyan XiangSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-0474
Davide PoliSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4486-8077
Bernard M DegnanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-8518
Sandie M DegnanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. s.degnan@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-0426
Queensland University of Technology · AUBGI Group (China) · CNThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP170102353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of host-symbiont interactions can benefit enormously from a complete and reliable holobiont gene expression profiling. The most efficient way to acquire holobiont transcriptomes is to perform RNA-Seq on both host and symbionts simultaneously. However, optimal methods for capturing both host and symbiont mRNAs are still under development, particularly when the host is a eukaryote and the symbionts are bacteria or archaea. Traditionally, poly(A)-enriched libraries have been used to capture eukaryotic mRNA, but the ability of this method to adequately capture bacterial mRNAs is unclear because of the short half-life of the bacterial transcripts. Here, we address this gap in knowledge with the aim of helping others to choose an appropriate RNA-Seq approach for analysis of animal host-bacterial symbiont transcriptomes. Specifically, we compared transcriptome bias, depth and coverage achieved by two different mRNA capture and sequencing strategies applied to the marine demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica holobiont. Annotated genomes of the sponge host and the three most abundant bacterial symbionts, which can comprise up to 95% of the adult microbiome, are available. Importantly, this allows for transcriptomes to be accurately mapped to these genomes, and thus quantitatively assessed and compared. The two strategies that we compare here are (i) poly(A) captured mRNA-Seq (Poly(A)-RNA-Seq) and (ii) ribosomal RNA depleted RNA-Seq (rRNA-depleted-RNA-Seq). For the host sponge, we find no significant difference in transcriptomes generated by the two different mRNA capture methods. However, for the symbiont transcriptomes, we confirm the expectation that the rRNA-depleted-RNA-Seq performs much better than the Poly(A)-RNA-Seq. This comparison demonstrates that RNA-Seq by ribosomal RNA depletion is an effective and reliable method to simultaneously capture gene expression in host and symbionts and thus to analyse holobiont transcriptomes.

Indexed as

PoriferaRNA, RibosomalAnimalsBacteriaGene Expression ProfilingRNA, MessengerRNA-SeqRNA, MessengerRNA, RibosomalDemospongeHolobiontHologenomePoriferaTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35895230
PMCPMC9385839
OpenAlexW4288051307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.