Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35895204›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Design Considerations for In-Field Measurement of Plant Architecture Traits Using Ground-Based Platforms.

Piyush Pandey, Sierra Young

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Piyush PandeyDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Sierra YoungDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA. sierra.young@usu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work provides a high-level overview of system design considerations for measuring plant architecture traits in row crops using ground-based, mobile platforms. High-throughput phenotyping technologies are commonly deployed in isolated growth chambers or greenhouses; however, there is a need for field-based systems to measure large quantities of plants exposed to natural climates throughout a growing season. High-throughput methods using ground-based mobile systems collect valuable phenotypic information at higher temporal resolutions compared to manual methods (e.g., handheld calipers and measuring sticks). Additionally, the close proximity to plants when using ground-based systems compared to aerial platforms enables plant phenotyping at the organ level. While there is no single best platform for obtaining ground-based plant measurements across crop varieties with different planting configurations, there are a wide range of off-the-shelf systems and sensors that can be integrated to accommodate varying row widths, plant spacing, plant heights, and plot sizes, in addition to emerging commercially available platforms. This chapter will provide an overview of sensor types suitable for phenotyping plant size and shape, as well as provide guidance for deployment with ground-based systems, including push carts or buggies, modified tractors, and robotic platforms.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalPhenotypeField-based phenotypingHigh-throughput phenotypingPlant architectureRow crops

Identifiers

PMID35895204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.