ArticleSurgical case reports2022
Accidental duodenal foreign body of toothbrush removed laparoscopically: a case report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Retrieval of Multiple Elongated Swallowed Foreign Bodies in a Patient With Psychiatric Illness.Cureus · 2025Article
- Asymptomatic spontaneous expulsion of a long foreign body through the gastrointestinal tract - a curious case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForeign body ingestion is a common case in daily medical care, and it usually passes through the entire gastrointestinal tract naturally and is excreted in the feces. However, long and sharp foreign bodies may be difficult to pass naturally due to their shape. Here, we present a rare case of a duodenal foreign body, a toothbrush, that required laparoscopic surgical removal after a failed endoscopic attempt. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old male with intellectual disability presented to our hospital due to fever. Initially, he was diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia by chest X-ray and blood examination. However, abdominal X-ray examination suggested a foreign body, and a computed tomography scan revealed a toothbrush in the duodenum. Therefore, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was immediately attempted to remove it, but it could not be safely removed because the handle part of the toothbrush seemed deeply embedded in the duodenal mucosa. Therefore, this case was diagnosed as duodenal incarceration of the toothbrush, and it was removed by laparoscopic surgery. The operation was performed safely, and the patient's postoperative course was good without any complications. The extracted toothbrush was 15 cm in length.
conclusionWe experienced a rare case of a duodenal foreign body, which was a toothbrush. The duodenal foreign body was safely removed by laparoscopic surgery for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.