Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35895182›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022

Update on Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Hypertension.

Arundati Rao, Namrata Krishnan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound Renal Denervation on Office Blood Pressure of Patients with Resistant Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arundati RaoYale School of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, New Haven, CT, USA.
Namrata KrishnanYale School of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, New Haven, CT, USA. Namrata.Krishnan@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9419-9193
Veterans Health Administration · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHypertension is a leading risk factor for all-cause mortality in adults; however, medication non-adherence and intolerance present an enormous treatment challenge. Given the critical role of renal sympathetic nerves in neurogenic control of blood pressure and pathophysiology of hypertension, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been explored as a therapeutic strategy in hypertension treatment over the last 15 years. In this review, we will discuss the role of renal sympathetic nerves in the pathophysiology of hypertension, provide an update on the available evidence regarding the short- and long-term safety and effectiveness of RDN in the treatment of hypertension, and consider its future perspectives. RECENT

findingsRDN is a percutaneous endovascular catheter-based neuromodulation approach that enables ablation of renal sympathetic nerve fibers within the adventitial layer of the renal arteries using radiofrequency (most extensively studied), ultrasound energy, or neurolytics (e.g., alcohol). In the last decade, advancements in procedural techniques and well-designed sham-controlled trials utilizing 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements have demonstrated that RDN has an excellent safety profile and results in a modest reduction of blood pressure, in a wide range of hypertensive phenotypes (mild to resistant), irrespective of antihypertensive drug use and this effect is sustained over a 3-year period. Superiority of a particular RDN modality has not been yet established. Despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy and safety of RDN, current data does not support its use as a primary approach in the treatment of hypertension due to its modest treatment effect and concerns around long-term sustainability. Perhaps the best utility of RDN is in hypertensives intolerant to antihypertensive medications or as an adjunct to aldosterone antagonists in the management of resistant hypertension. Patient selection will be critical to demonstrate a meaningful benefit of RDN. Future well-designed studies are necessary to determine predictors and measures of response to RDN, long-term efficacy given question of renal nerve regeneration, comparison of available technologies, safety in patients with advanced kidney disease, and improvement in patient quality of life measures.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansKidneyMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsQuality of LifeSympathectomyTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsBlood pressureHypertensionNeuromodulationRenal denervationResistantSympathetic nerves

Identifiers

PMID35895182
OpenAlexW4288067290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.