Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35895156›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2022

Peripheral tissular analysis of rapamycin's effect as a neuroprotective agent in vivo.

Alfredo Gonzalez-Alcocer, Yareth Gopar-Cuevas, Adolfo Soto-Dominguez, Maria de Jesus Loera-Arias, Odila Saucedo-Cardenas, Roberto Montes de Oca-Luna, Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha, Aracely Garcia-Garcia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alfredo Gonzalez-AlcocerDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Yareth Gopar-CuevasDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Adolfo Soto-DominguezDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Maria de Jesus Loera-AriasDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Odila Saucedo-CardenasDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Roberto Montes de Oca-LunaDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Humberto Rodriguez-RochaDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Aracely Garcia-GarciaDepartamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco I. Madero S/N, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. aracely.garciagr@uanl.edu.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1699-9678
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapamycin is the best-characterized autophagy inducer, which is related to its antiaging and neuroprotective effects. Although rapamycin is an FDA-approved drug for human use in organ transplantation and cancer therapy, its administration as an antiaging and neuroprotective agent is still controversial because of its immunosuppressive and reported side effects. Therefore, it is critical to determine whether the dose that exerts a neuroprotective effect, 35 times lower than that used as an immunosuppressant agent, harms peripheral organs. We validated the rapamycin neuroprotective dosage in a Parkinson's disease (PD) model induced with paraquat. C57BL/6 J mice were treated with intraperitoneal (IP) rapamycin (1 mg/kg) three times per week, followed by paraquat (10 mg/kg) twice per week for 6 weeks, along with rapamycin on alternate days. Rapamycin significantly decreased dopaminergic neuronal loss induced by paraquat. Since rapamycin's neuroprotective effect in a PD model was observed at 7 weeks of treatment; we evaluated its effect on the liver, kidney, pancreas, and spleen. In addition, we prolonged treatment with rapamycin for 14 weeks. Tissue sections were subjected to histochemical, immunodetection, and morphometric analysis. Chronic rapamycin administration does not affect bodyweight, survival, and liver or kidney morphology. Although the pancreas tissular architecture and cellular distribution in Langerhans islets are modified, they may be reversible. The spleen B lymphocyte and macrophage populations were decreased. Notably, the lymphocyte T population was not affected. Therefore, chronic administration of a rapamycin neuroprotective dose does not produce significant tissular alterations. Our findings support the therapeutic potential of rapamycin as a neuroprotective agent.

Indexed as

Neuroprotective AgentsAnimalsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLParaquatSirolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsNeuroprotective AgentsParaquatSirolimusChronic exposureHistologymTORNeuroprotective doseRapamycin

Identifiers

PMID35895156
OpenAlexW4288175653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.