ArticleBiochemistry2022
Oncogenic Mutations in the DNA-Binding Domain of FOXO1 that Disrupt Folding: Quantitative Insights from Experiments and Molecular Simulations.
Article in Biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Markov State Model of Solvent Features Reveals Water Dynamics in Protein-Peptide Binding.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Folding@home: Achievements from over 20 years of citizen science herald the exascale era.Biophysical journal · 2023Review
- Folding@home: achievements from over twenty years of citizen science herald the exascale era.ArXiv · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
FOXO1, a member of the family of winged-helix motif Forkhead box (FOX) transcription factors, is the most abundantly expressed FOXO member in mature B cells. Sequencing of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tumors and cell lines identified specific mutations in the forkhead domain linked to loss of function. Differential scanning calorimetry and thermal shift assays were used to characterize how eight of these mutations affect the stability of the FOX domain. Mutations L183P and L183R were found to be particularly destabilizing. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays show these same mutations also disrupt FOXO1 binding to their canonical DNA sequences, suggesting that the loss of function is due to destabilization of the folded structure. Computational modeling of the effect of mutations on FOXO1 folding was performed using alchemical free energy perturbation (FEP), and a Markov model of the entire folding reaction was constructed from massively parallel molecular simulations, which predicts folding pathways involving the late folding of helix α3. Although FEP can qualitatively predict the destabilization from L183 mutations, we find that a simple hydrophobic transfer model, combined with estimates of unfolded-state solvent-accessible surface areas from molecular simulations, is able to more accurately predict changes in folding free energies due to mutations. These results suggest that the atomic detail provided by simulations is important for the accurate prediction of mutational effects on folding stability. Corresponding disease-associated mutations in other FOX family members support further experimental and computational studies of the folding mechanism of FOX domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.