SynthesisJAMA surgery2022
Nonoperative vs Operative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotics on nonoperative management outcomes in uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Pooled it
- Reevaluating Nonoperative Management for Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing nonoperative versus operative management for uncomplicated appendicitis: a focus on randomized controlled trials.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Pooled it
- Non-operative versus operative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study in Sierra Leone.BMC surgery · 2026Trial
- Treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis: is interval appendectomy an effective strategy?Surgery today · 2026Article
- Analysis of predictive factors and development of a nomogram for complicated acute appendicitis in adults.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Agreement Between Intraoperative Findings and Histopathological Diagnosis and Their Association with Postoperative Outcomes in Acute Appendicitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of oral contrast use in CT imaging for acute appendicitis on time to surgery: a single-center before-after cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Non-operative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis: A Review of Indications, Safety, and Clinical Algorithms.Cureus · 2026Review
- Nutritional Status as a Risk Factor for Appendiceal Perforation in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Management of acute abdomen in clinical acute and emergency medicine : Focus on gastrointestinal diseases].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Submarine medicine as an analog for spaceflight: a review of acute medical care.NPJ microgravity · 2026Review
- More than just appendicitis: incidental detection of a serrated polyp with malignant potential.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Childhood appendectomy is linked with higher digestive, respiratory, and genitourinary disease risk but lower inflammatory bowel disease risk.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2026Article
- Gut check: antimicrobial stewardship opportunities in intra-abdominal infections.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- Article
- Personalized Approaches to Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Appendicolith in non-operative management of acute appendicitis: Implications for recurrence and future directions.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Association of hospital profit status with operative rates for acute appendicitis.Surgery open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Appendectomy remains the standard of care for uncomplicated acute appendicitis despite several randomized clinical trials pointing to the safety and efficacy of nonoperative management of this disease. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials may contribute to the body of evidence and help surgeons select which patients may benefit from surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of nonoperative management vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (Embase and PubMed) to search for published randomized clinical trials in English comparing nonoperative management with appendectomy in adult patients presenting with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. To increase sensitivity, no limits were set for outcomes reported, sex, or year of publication. All nonrandomized or quasi-randomized trials were excluded, and validated primers were used. Study Selection: Among 1504 studies imported for screening, 805 were duplicates, and 595 were excluded for irrelevancy. A further 96 were excluded after full-text review, mainly owing to wrong study design or inclusion of pediatric populations. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Meta-extraction was conducted with independent extraction by multiple reviewers using the Covidence platform for systematic reviews and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled by a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment success and major adverse effects at 30 days' follow-up. Results: The main outcome (treatment success proportion at 30 days of follow-up) was not significantly different in the operative and nonoperative management cohorts (risk ratio [RR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.11). Likewise, the percentage of major adverse effects was similar in both cohorts (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.79). However, in the nonoperative management group, length of stay was significantly longer (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70), and a median cumulative incidence of 18% of recurrent appendicitis was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: These results point to the general safety and efficacy of nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, this strategy may be associated with an increase in duration of hospital stay and a higher rate of recurrent appendicitis. This meta-analysis may help inform decision-making in nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.