Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894770›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2022

A prediction model integrating synchronization biomarkers and clinical features to identify responders to vagus nerve stimulation among pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Jiayi Ma, Zhiyan Wang, Tungyang Cheng, Yingbing Hu, Xiaoya Qin, Wen Wang, Guojing Yu, Qingzhu Liu, Taoyun Ji, Han Xie and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors predicting the response to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in pediatric patients with drug- resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Identifying responders to vagus nerve stimulation based on microstructural features of thalamocortical tracts in drug-resistant epilepsy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiayi MaDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-1770
Zhiyan WangNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Tungyang ChengNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yingbing HuNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoya QinNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Wen WangPediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guojing YuPediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingzhu LiuPediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Taoyun JiDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Han XieDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Daqi ZhaNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shuang WangPediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhixian YangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-8725
Xiaoyan LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lixin CaiPediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuwu JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongwei HaoNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jing WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Department of Neurology, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Luming LiNational Engineering laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ye WuDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNTsinghua University · CNCapital Medical University · CNTsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy for children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The efficacy of VNS is heterogeneous. A prediction model is needed to predict the efficacy before implantation.

methodsWe collected data from children with DRE who underwent VNS implantation and received regular programming for at least 1 year. Preoperative clinical information and scalp video electroencephalography (EEG) were available in 88 children. Synchronization features, including phase lag index (PLI), weighted phase lag index (wPLI), and phase-locking value (PLV), were compared between responders and non-responders. We further adapted a support vector machine (SVM) classifier selected from 25 clinical and 18 synchronization features to build a prediction model for efficacy in a discovery cohort (n = 70) and was tested in an independent validation cohort (n = 18).

resultsIn the discovery cohort, the average interictal awake PLI in the high beta band was significantly higher in responders than non-responders (p < 0.05). The SVM classifier generated from integrating both clinical and synchronization features had the best prediction efficacy, demonstrating an accuracy of 75.7%, precision of 80.8% and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.766 on 10-fold cross-validation. In the validation cohort, the prediction model demonstrated an accuracy of 61.1%.

conclusionThis study established the first prediction model integrating clinical and baseline synchronization features for preoperative VNS responder screening among children with DRE. With further optimization of the model, we hope to provide an effective and convenient method for identifying responders before VNS implantation.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationBiomarkersChildElectroencephalographyHumansTreatment OutcomeVagus NerveBiomarkersdrug-resistant epilepsymachine learningscalp electroencephalographysynchronizationvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35894770
PMCPMC9532924
OpenAlexW4288066785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.