Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894705›Full record

ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2022

Serological findings following the second and third SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in lung transplant recipients.

Enikő Bárczi, Viktória Varga, Alexandra Nagy, Noémi Eszes, Zsuzsanna Jáky-Kováts, Veronika Müller, Anikó Bohács

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predominantly defective CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. mRNA Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: Advantages and Caveats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enikő BárcziDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9644-4172
Viktória VargaDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexandra NagyDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-9256
Noémi EszesDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna Jáky-KovátsDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6145-6595
Veronika MüllerDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-3187
Anikó BohácsDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-4254
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung transplant recipients (LuTX) represent a vulnerable population for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Even though many vaccines are already developed, more clinical data need to support effective immunological response in immunocompromised patients.

methodsStable LuTX recipients with no medical history of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) were enrolled. Currently available messenger RNA (mRNA) (BNT162b2-mRNA, mRNA-1273) and non-mRNA (ChAdOx1, BBIBP-CorV) vaccines were given according to availability, boosters were all mRNA-based. SARS-CoV-2 Spike1 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titer was evaluated before and 2 weeks after second and third dose. Difference between mRNA versus non-mRNA vaccines was assessed.

resultsForty-one patients (49% men, age 48.4 ± 13.8 years) received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: 23 of mRNA, 18 of non-mRNA, and 24/41 (58%) received a third dose. Median 92 months passed since transplantation, and serum level of tacrolimus was median 5.5 ng/ml. Positive serology was found in 37% of all patients after the second dose, 86% had mRNA vaccine. After the third dose, 29% became positive who had no antibody before. Significantly higher level of antibody was found after the second mRNA than non-mRNA vaccines (2.2 vs. 1568.8 U/ml, respectively, p = .002). 6/23 (26%) patients received two doses of mRNA vaccine developed COVID-19 after the second injection in an average of 178 days, half of them recovered, half of them died in intensive care unit (ICU). 3/6 (50%) patients with two doses mRNA and recovered from COVID-19 had significantly higher level of antibody (average 20847.3 U/ml) than without infection. After the booster vaccine, 1/24 (4%) developed infection.

conclusionImmunosuppression therapy may induce a weaker SARS-CoV-2 response in LuTX recipients; therefore, third dose is a priority in transplanted patients. The highest antibody level was measured recovering from COVID after two doses. Our data confirm that booster mRNA vaccine could increase antibody levels, even if immunization was started with non-mRNA vaccine.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesTransplant RecipientsAdultAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Viral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesCOVID-19mRNA vaccinenon-mRNA vaccinepandemicSARS-CoV-2third vaccinationtransplantvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35894705
PMCPMC9311263
OpenAlexW4287834755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.