ArticleAnnals of surgery2022
Liver Transplantation as a New Standard of Care in Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? Results From an International Benchmark Study.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term Outcomes of Protocol-based Neoadjuvant Selection and Liver Transplantation Versus Liver Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in liver transplantation for hepatic malignancies.Hepatic oncology · 2026Review
- Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancers: Largest Single-Center Analysis of Subtype-Specific Survival and Recurrence (2007-2025).Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Liver Transplant Versus Partial Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Requiring Arterial Reconstruction.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma beyond the Mayo protocol: a challenge for SURE.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Liver resection with and without vascular resection versus transplantation for de novo perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Hospital variation in surgical outcomes for gastric cancer: the impact of case-mix and treatment across a global cohort.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- Outcome reporting for liver transplantation machine perfusion studies: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Present and future of liver transplantation for cholangiocellular carcinoma: moving toward personalized multiparametric transplantability patterns.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Operative and Oncological Outcomes of Vascular Resection and Reconstruction for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Embarking on improvement cycles - the next steps in surgical benchmarking.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Is there a difference in textbook outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in older patients compared with younger patients?World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Defining benchmark values for outcomes of comprehensive resection of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a retrospective multicenter study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Modern therapeutic approaches for hepatic tumors: progress, limitations, and future directions.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Safety and efficacy of living donor liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single center prospective study.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of postoperative complications on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer: multicentre study.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Rescue liver transplantation for post-hepatectomy liver failure- single center retrospective analysis.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Benchmark Outcomes in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Analysis of 80 996 Transplants From 126 Centers.Transplantation direct · 2024Article
- National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo define benchmark values for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) enabling unbiased comparisons.
backgroundTransplantation for PHC is used with reluctance in many centers and even contraindicated in several countries. Although benchmark values for LT are available, there is a lack of specific data on LT performed for PHC.
methodsPHC patients considered for LT after Mayo-like protocol were analyzed in 17 reference centers in 2 continents over the recent 5-year period (2014-2018). The minimum follow-up was 1 year. Benchmark patients were defined as operated at high-volume centers (≥50 overall LT/year) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with a tumor diameter <3 cm, negative lymph nodes, and with the absence of relevant comorbidities. Benchmark cutoff values were derived from the 75th to 25th percentiles of the median values of all benchmark centers.
resultsOne hundred thirty-four consecutive patients underwent LT after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment. Of those, 89.6% qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cutoffs were 90-day mortality ≤5.2%; comprehensive complication index at 1 year of ≤33.7; grade ≥3 complication rates ≤66.7%. These values were better than benchmark values for other indications of LT. Five-year disease-free survival was largely superior compared with a matched group of nodal negative patients undergoing curative liver resection (n=106) (62% vs 32%, P <0.001).
conclusionThis multicenter benchmark study demonstrates that LT offers excellent outcomes with superior oncological results in early stage PHC patients, even in candidates for surgery. This provocative observation should lead to a change in available therapeutic algorithms for PHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.