Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894182›Full record

ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

Hallmarks of neurodegenerative disease: A systems pharmacology perspective.

Peter Bloomingdale, Tatiana Karelina, Vidya Ramakrishnan, Suruchi Bakshi, Florence Véronneau-Veilleux, Matthew Moye, Kazutaka Sekiguchi, Guy Meno-Tetang, Aparna Mohan, R Maithreye and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Peter BloomingdaleQuantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2860-6488
Tatiana KarelinaInSysBio, Moscow, Russia.
Vidya RamakrishnanClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Suruchi BakshiCertara QSP, Oss, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7767-1705
Florence Véronneau-VeilleuxFaculté de Pharmacie, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew MoyeQuantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kazutaka SekiguchiShionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Guy Meno-TetangNeuroscience, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Aparna MohanVantage Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
R MaithreyeVantage Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Veena A ThomasAmgen, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Frank GibbonsClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-1740
Antonio CabalEisai, Nutley, New Jersey, USA.
Jean-Marie BouteillerCenter for Neural Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Hugo GeertsCertara QSP, Oss, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-1800
Quantitative BioSciences · USVoluntary Health Services Hospital · INAmgen (United States) · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBBiogen (United States) · USEisai (United States) · USInSysBio (Russia) · RUNetherlands Research School for Literary Studies · NLPrinceton University · USSunesis (United States) · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related central neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, are a rising public health concern and have been plagued by repeated drug development failures. The complex nature and poor mechanistic understanding of the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases has hindered the discovery and development of effective disease-modifying therapeutics. Quantitative systems pharmacology models of neurodegeneration diseases may be useful tools to enhance the understanding of pharmacological intervention strategies and to reduce drug attrition rates. Due to the similarities in pathophysiological mechanisms across neurodegenerative diseases, especially at the cellular and molecular levels, we envision the possibility of structural components that are conserved across models of neurodegenerative diseases. Conserved structural submodels can be viewed as building blocks that are pieced together alongside unique disease components to construct quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models of neurodegenerative diseases. Model parameterization would likely be different between the different types of neurodegenerative diseases as well as individual patients. Formulating our mechanistic understanding of neurodegenerative pathophysiology as a mathematical model could aid in the identification and prioritization of drug targets and combinatorial treatment strategies, evaluate the role of patient characteristics on disease progression and therapeutic response, and serve as a central repository of knowledge. Here, we provide a background on neurodegenerative diseases, highlight hallmarks of neurodegeneration, and summarize previous QSP models of neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesParkinson DiseasePharmacologyDisease ProgressionHumansModels, TheoreticalNetwork Pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID35894182
PMCPMC9662204
OpenAlexW4288050569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.