Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894108›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Support towards the end of life and beyond: Non-kin care commitment for older people living alone in Austria.

Judith Kieninger, Paulina Wosko, Sabine Pleschberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Judith KieningerGesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG, Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria.
Paulina WoskoGesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG, Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8395-6168
Sabine PleschbergerGesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG, Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-3193

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-kin carers provide vital resources for older people living alone with increasing care needs, especially if they cannot rely on the support of family members. However, this kind of commitment presents numerous challenges throughout the care trajectory and beyond. To explore these aspects in more depth, a qualitative study was designed including a retrospective interpretation of interview data with non-kin carers (n = 15) and additional in-depth interviews (n = 8) with people who had cared for an older person living alone with no family nearby. Analyses of the verbatim transcriptions followed coding procedures and were supported by MaxQDA software. Our findings demonstrate that non-kin carers had to negotiate personal boundaries continuously over the end-of-life trajectory to deal with the increasing complexity of care demands and overburdening situations. Following the older person's death, non-kin carers were involved in funeral arrangements and settled practical or legal matters when no family members were available or had little inclination to contribute. The findings highlight that non-kin carers make a great effort to safeguard the interests and needs of older people living alone, ensuring their autonomy and dignity towards the end of life and beyond. However, the burdens experienced require future research to better understand the support needs of non-kin carers providing end-of-life care for an older person living alone.

Indexed as

Home EnvironmentTerminal CareAgedAustriaCaregiversDeathHumansQualitative ResearchRetrospective Studiesboundariesburdensend of lifehome deathnon-kin care

Identifiers

PMID35894108
PMCPMC7614260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.