Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894040›Full record

ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2022

Telehealth Adoption in an Outpatient Oncology Ward: A Best Practice Implementation Project.

Filipa Ventura, Helena Domingues, Gisela Almeida, Daniela Cardoso, Rogério Rodrigues, Isabel Moreira, Mariana Pires, Inês Gomes, Rosa Silva, Cláudia Oliveira and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filipa VenturaThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5722-5612
Helena DominguesPortuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPO Coimbra), Outpatient Oncology Ward, 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Gisela AlmeidaPortuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPO Coimbra), Outpatient Oncology Ward, 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Daniela CardosoThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1425-885X
Rogério RodriguesThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Isabel MoreiraThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6371-003X
Mariana PiresPortuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPO Coimbra), Outpatient Oncology Ward, 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0923-2356
Inês GomesPortuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPO Coimbra), Outpatient Oncology Ward, 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Rosa SilvaThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-7098
Cláudia OliveiraThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4365-6790
Ana Filipa CardosoThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Liliana RibeiroThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Cristina CosteiraThe Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4648-355X
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra · PTInstituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil · PTInstituto Politécnico de Leiria · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth is increasingly taking place to support the transition of care and self-management of people living with cancer in outpatient oncology settings. Despite its recognised value, the scientific evidence points to disparities with regard to implementation of telehealth that might compromise the equity of access. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) implementation approach, this project aims to promote the implementation of best practice recommendations for telehealth adoption in an outpatient oncology setting. Assisted by the Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES), the implementation process comprises three phases of (i) a baseline audit, (ii) feedback to the healthcare team and establishment of implementation strategies with the Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool, and (iii) a follow-up audit. The project is expected to allow the identification of barriers and facilitators for the implementation of telehealth in outpatient oncology and develop a strategy plan for its adoption, with the involvement of end-users and stakeholders. The successful adoption of telehealth according to the best available evidence will likely enhance equity of access to healthcare and quality of care at a distance.

Indexed as

best practicesimplementation scienceinformation and communication technologyoutpatient oncologytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35894040
PMCPMC9326749
OpenAlexW4285395604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.