Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894016›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Mortality Prediction Analysis among COVID-19 Inpatients Using Clinical Variables and Deep Learning Chest Radiography Imaging Features.

Xuan V Nguyen, Engin Dikici, Sema Candemir, Robyn L Ball, Luciano M Prevedello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Using Explainable AI to Cross-Validate Socio-economic Disparities Among Covid-19 Patient Mortality.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuan V NguyenLaboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Engin DikiciLaboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Sema CandemirLaboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Robyn L BallThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-3339
Luciano M PrevedelloLaboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6768-6452

Funding

MEDICAL IMAGING AND DATA RESOURCE CENTER (MIDRC) YEAR 375N92020D00021 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN · 2021 to 2025
$16.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020D00021NIH HHS 75N92020D00021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic over a relatively brief interval illustrates the need for rapid data-driven approaches to facilitate clinical decision making. We examined a machine learning process to predict inpatient mortality among COVID-19 patients using clinical and chest radiographic data. Modeling was performed with a de-identified dataset of encounters prior to widespread vaccine availability. Non-imaging predictors included demographics, pre-admission clinical history, and past medical history variables. Imaging features were extracted from chest radiographs by applying a deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning. A multi-layer perceptron combining 64 deep learning features from chest radiographs with 98 patient clinical features was trained to predict mortality. The Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) method was used to explain model predictions. Non-imaging data alone predicted mortality with an ROC-AUC of 0.87 ± 0.03 (mean ± SD), while the addition of imaging data improved prediction slightly (ROC-AUC: 0.91 ± 0.02). The application of LIME to the combined imaging and clinical model found HbA1c values to contribute the most to model prediction (17.1 ± 1.7%), while imaging contributed 8.8 ± 2.8%. Age, gender, and BMI contributed 8.7%, 8.2%, and 7.1%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate a viable explainable AI approach to quantify the contributions of imaging and clinical data to COVID mortality predictions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningHumansInpatientsPandemicsRadiographychest radiographscomputer-aided diagnosis/prognosisCOVIDexplainable AImachine learningmulti-modal analysistransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID35894016
PMCPMC9326627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.