Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894012›Full record

ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Non-Invasive Modalities in the Assessment of Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques.

Panagiotis Theofilis, Marios Sagris, Alexios S Antonopoulos, Evangelos Oikonomou, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Dimitris Tousoulis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Coronary Plaque Erosion: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque: Is There a Molecular Signature?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panagiotis Theofilis1st Cardiology Department, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9260-6306
Marios Sagris1st Cardiology Department, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3473-1368
Alexios S Antonopoulos1st Cardiology Department, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Evangelos Oikonomou1st Cardiology Department, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-0599
Konstantinos Tsioufis1st Cardiology Department, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Dimitris Tousoulis1st Cardiology Department, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary atherosclerosis is a complex, multistep process that may lead to critical complications upon progression, revolving around plaque disruption through either rupture or erosion. Several high-risk features are associated with plaque vulnerability and may add incremental prognostic information. Although invasive imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography or intravascular ultrasound are considered to be the gold standard in the assessment of vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaques (VCAPs), contemporary evidence suggests a potential role for non-invasive methods in this context. Biomarkers associated with deleterious pathophysiologic pathways, including inflammation and extracellular matrix degradation, have been correlated with VCAP characteristics and adverse prognosis. However, coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography has been the most extensively investigated technique, significantly correlating with invasive method-derived VCAP features. The estimation of perivascular fat attenuation as well as radiomic-based approaches represent additional concepts that may add incremental information. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also been evaluated in clinical studies, with promising results through the various image sequences that have been tested. As far as nuclear cardiology is concerned, the implementation of positron emission tomography in the VCAP assessment currently faces several limitations with the myocardial uptake of the radiotracer in cases of fluorodeoxyglucose use, as well as with motion correction. Moreover, the search for the ideal radiotracer and the most adequate combination (CT or MRI) is still ongoing. With a look to the future, the possible combination of imaging and circulating inflammatory and extracellular matrix degradation biomarkers in diagnostic and prognostic algorithms may represent the essential next step for the assessment of high-risk individuals.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyHumansUltrasonography, Interventionalatherosclerosisbiomarkercoronary CT angiographynon-invasive imagingvulnerable plaque

Identifiers

PMID35894012
PMCPMC9326642
OpenAlexW4284897048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.