Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35894001›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Photon-Counting Detector CT Virtual Monoengergetic Images for Cochlear Implant Visualization-A Head to Head Comparison to Energy-Integrating Detector CT.

Stephan Waldeck, Daniel Overhoff, Leona Alizadeh, Benjamin V Becker, Matthias Port, Matthias F Froelich, Marc A Brockmann, Sven Schumann, Thomas J Vogl, Stefan O Schoenberg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improved assessment of the cochlear implant and temporal bone structures with ultra-high resolution photon-counting detector CT compared to conventional CT systems.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Photon-counting detector computed tomography for temporal bone: does higher resolution matter?Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephan WaldeckDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Straße 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.
Daniel OverhoffDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Straße 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5881-4769
Leona AlizadehDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Straße 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.
Benjamin V BeckerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Straße 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-8797
Matthias PortBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Neuherbergstraße 11, 80937 München, Germany.
Matthias F FroelichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-2147
Marc A BrockmannInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Sven SchumannInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1785-622X
Thomas J VoglDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-1075
Stefan O SchoenbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Sandra SchmidtDepartment of ENT Surgery, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Straße 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2306-6251
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEHeidelberg University · DEBundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) are the primary treatment method in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Interpretation of postoperative imaging with conventional energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) following CI surgery remains challenging due to metal artifacts. Still, the photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) is a new emerging technology with the potential to eliminate these problems. This study evaluated the performance of virtual monoenergetic (VME) EID-CT images versus PCD-CT in CI imaging. In this cadaveric study, two temporal bone specimens with implanted CIs were scanned with EID-CT and PCD-CT. The images were assessed according to the visibility of interelectrode wire, size of electrode contact, and diameter of halo artifacts. The visibility of interelectrode wire sections was significantly higher when reviewing PCD-CT images. The difference in diameter measurements for electrode contacts between the two CT scanner modalities showed that the PCD-CT technology generally led to significantly larger diameter readings. The larger measurements were closer to the manufacturer's specifications for the CI electrode. The size of halo artifacts surrounding the electrode contacts did not differ significantly between the two imaging modalities. PCT-CT imaging is a promising technology for CI imaging with improved spatial resolution and better visibility of small structures than conventional EID-CT.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsHumansPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedTomography, X-Ray Computedcadaver studycochlear implantenergy-integrating detector CThigh-resolution computed tomographymetal artifactsphoton-counting detector CTspatial resolutionvirtual monoenergetic imaging

Identifiers

PMID35894001
PMCPMC9326530
OpenAlexW4283329274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.