Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893937›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Study on the Impact and Water Absorption Performance of

Manoj Kumar Gurunathan, Navasingh Rajesh Jesudoss Hynes, Omar Ali Al-Khashman, Michael Brykov, Nagasubramoniam Ganesh, Antoaneta Ene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Manoj Kumar GurunathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi 626005, Tamil Nadu, India.
Navasingh Rajesh Jesudoss HynesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi 626005, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-473X
Omar Ali Al-KhashmanDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, P.O. Box 20, Ma'an 71111, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-3282-2346
Michael BrykovDepartment of Equipment and Technologies of Welding Production, Zaporizhzhya Polytechnic National University, 69063 Zaporizhzhya, Zaporiz'ka Oblast', Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-8158-1278
Nagasubramoniam GaneshDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi 626005, Tamil Nadu, India.
Antoaneta EneINPOLDE Research Center, Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca St., 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6976-0767
Al-Hussein Bin Talal University · JO"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati · RONational University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current global trends demand the replacement of synthetic fibres with natural fibres in polymeric composites. The present work makes use of Prosopis juliflora, a plant that is a threat to the environment as a partial replacement in a hybrid composite. Individual Prosopis juliflora fibres are added to matrices at ratios of 12, 6, 9 and 8 wt % and glass fibres are added discretely at ratios of 28, 24, 21 and 32 wt % into matrices as well. The composites are prepared with four different combinations and tested in terms of the mechanical benefits and water absorption performance. This work exploits the mechanical advantage of impact energy in addition to producing Prosopis juliflora particles, fibre glass mats, and resin appropriate for structural uses. Water absorption tests are conducted for four different compositions. Among the four samples, sample 3 (9 wt % Prosopis juliflora fibres and 21 wt % glass fibres) has a higher rate of water absorption than the others, although sample 2 (6 wt % Prosopis juliflora fibres and 24 wt % glass fibres) has a lower rate. The difference in the quantity of water absorption between the hybrid composites can be attributed to the weight percentage of fibres. On the other hand, sample 1 (12 wt % Prosopis juliflora fibres and 28 wt % glass fibres) is reported to have absorbed 2.6 J of energy in the impact strength test. The increase in impact strength is attributed to the increase in the weight percentage of glass fibres. A scanning electron microscope is employed to study the fractured surfaces of the composites. This study shows that the developed hybrid composite could be employed in structural and automotive applications because of its improved impact strength and water resistance.

Indexed as

glass fibrehybrid compositeimpact strengthProsopis juliflorawater absorption

Identifiers

PMID35893937
PMCPMC9330436
OpenAlexW4287149023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.