Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893806›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Micromolding of Amphotericin-B-Loaded Methoxyethylene-Maleic Anhydride Copolymer Microneedles.

Sina Azizi Machekposhti, Alexander K Nguyen, Lyndsi Vanderwal, Shane Stafslien, Roger J Narayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Motion artifact-controlled micro-brain sensors between hair follicles for persistent augmented reality brain-computer interfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sina Azizi MachekposhtiJoint UNC/NCSU Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Alexander K NguyenJoint UNC/NCSU Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Lyndsi VanderwalCoatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Shane StafslienCoatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Roger J NarayanJoint UNC/NCSU Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4876-9869

Funding

Office of Naval Research N00014-20-1-2236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocompatible and biodegradable materials have been used for fabricating polymeric microneedles to deliver therapeutic drug molecules through the skin. Microneedles have advantages over other drug delivery methods, such as low manufacturing cost, controlled drug release, and the reduction or absence of pain. The study examined the delivery of amphotericin B, an antifungal agent, using microneedles that were fabricated using a micromolding technique. The microneedle matrix was made from Gantrez

Indexed as

amphotericin Bfungusmicroneedlestransdermal drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID35893806
PMCPMC9331399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.