Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893759›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Randomised, Single Blind, Controlled, Three-Month Clinical Trial on the Evaluation and Treatment of the Ocular Surface Damage Following Phacoemulsification.

Gemma Caterina Maria Rossi, Carmine Tinelli, Giovanni Milano, Sara Lanteri, Gabriella Ricciarelli, Laura Giannì, Gian Maria Pasinetti, Luigia Scudeller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma Caterina Maria RossiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University Eye Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Carmine TinelliClinical Epidemiology and Biometric Unit, Scientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni MilanoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University Eye Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Sara LanteriDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University Eye Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Gabriella RicciarelliDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University Eye Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Laura GiannìDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University Eye Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Gian Maria PasinettiEye Unit, Istituto Beato Palazzolo, 24100 Bergamo, Italy.
Luigia ScudellerClinical Epidemiology and Biometric Unit, Scientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Bergamo EstUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To determine efficacy of two lacrimal substitutes on signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease after phacoemulsification; to determine impact of surgery on patients’ vision related quality of life. Monocentric, randomised, physician blinded, three parallel groups clinical trial. Design and Methods: Patients in the operative list for phacoemulsification have been screened for eligibility; they underwent (at time 0, 15, 45 and 90 days): slit lamp examination; tear film break-up time (BUT); corneal staining; tear volume; 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ); Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Treatments to be compared were: 1. standard of care-SOC (lomefloxacine and tobramicine/dexamethasone fixed combination 4 times a day for 2 weeks), 2. SOC + carboxymethylcellulose sodium 0.5% and glycerin 0.9%, 3. SOC + Sodium Hyaluronate 0.15%. Study treatment started at T15. Groups were compared with parametric or nonparametric tests, and with Pearson’s χ2 test. Correlation between continuous variables was assessed by means of Pearson’s or Spearman’s coefficient. Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. At 45 and at 90 days from surgery, the group receiving lacrimal substitutes presented better BUT and Schirmer I test (p = 0.009, <0.001, <0.001 and 0.001, respectively); dry eye presence showed significant difference by group at time 90 (p = 0.019). General vision, near activity and vision-specific dependency subscales improved after surgery (p = <0.001, 0.004 and 0.048, respectively). At 45 and 90 days from surgery, the OSDI score significantly changed (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Cataract surgery causes the onset or the worsening of dry eye. Use of artificial tears can significantly reduce symptoms and signs of dry eye in patients after phacoemulsification.

Indexed as

BUTcarboxymethylcellulosecataract surgerycorneal stainingdry eyeNational Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ)Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)phacoemulsificationSchirmer testsodium hyaluronate

Identifiers

PMID35893759
PMCPMC9326562
OpenAlexW4284882633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.