ArticleViruses2022
Characterization and Genomic Analysis of Novel
Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A virulent phage vB_VpaP_R28Z infecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus with potential for therapeutic application.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Characterization and genome analysis of a novel phage BP15 infecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characterization and Genomic Analyses of dsDNA Vibriophage vB_VpaM_XM1, Representing a New Viral Family.Marine drugs · 2024Article
- Isolation and Characterization of NovelBiomedicines · 2024Article
- Characterization of aFood science and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Phenotypic characterization and genomic analysis ofCurrent research in food science · 2024Article
- Characterization and Preliminary Application of a Novel LyticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Review
- In Vitro Activity, Stability and Molecular Characterization of Eight Potent Bacteriophages Infecting Carbapenem-ResistantViruses · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, a novel lytic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.