ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Reproducibility and Sensitivity of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS)-Based Detection of Citrus Tristeza Virus and Three Citrus Viroids.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From reads to results: comparing Oxford Nanopore to Illumina sequencing for citrus virus surveillance.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the influence of RNA extraction methods on the detection of citrus viruses and viroids.Virology journal · 2025Article
- Next Generation Sequencing, and Development of a Pipeline as a Tool for the Detection and Discovery of Citrus Pathogens to Facilitate Safer Germplasm Exchange.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) for Routine Detection of Citrus Viruses and Viroids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The credibility of a pathogen detection assay is measured using specific parameters including repeatability, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. The use of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) as a routine detection assay for viruses and viroids in citrus was previously evaluated and, in this study, the reproducibility and sensitivity of the HTS assay were assessed. To evaluate the reproducibility of HTS, the same plants assayed in a previous study were sampled again, one year later, and assessed in triplicate using the same analyses to construct the virome profile. The sensitivity of the HTS assay was compared to routinely used RT-PCR assays in a time course experiment, to compensate for natural pathogen accumulation in plants over time. The HTS pipeline applied in this study produced reproducible and comparable results to standard RT-PCR assays for the detection of CTV and three viroid species in citrus. Even though the limit of detection of HTS can be influenced by pathogen concentration, sample processing method and sequencing depth, detection with HTS was found to be either equivalent or more sensitive than RT-PCR in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.