Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893591›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2022

Protocol for Evaluating the Microbial Inactivation of Commercial UV Devices on Plastic Surfaces.

Olivia C Haley, Yeqi Zhao, Manreet Bhullar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivia C HaleyDepartment of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS 66061, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7237-8895
Yeqi ZhaoDepartment of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS 66061, USA.
Manreet BhullarDepartment of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS 66061, USA.

Funding

SARIN Energy Solutions N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the plethora of commercially available UV-C devices exhibiting different intensity and lifespans, it is critical to consumer safety that companies verify and clearly communicate the efficacy of their devices as per the intended use. The purpose of this study was to define a low-cost protocol for investigating the antimicrobial efficacy of commercial UV devices for industry use. The tested devices included: a wall-mounted unit (Device A), a troffer unit (Device B), and an induction lamp unit (Device C). The devices were installed within an enclosed tower to prevent the transmission of UV-C radiation outside of the testing area. The procedure details determining the devices' antimicrobial efficacy using plastic coupons inoculated with

Indexed as

Escherichia colimicrobial inactivationStaphylococcus aureusUVC

Identifiers

PMID35893591
PMCPMC9332507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.