Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893568›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Bacterial Volatiles Known to Inhibit

Aurélie Gfeller, Pascal Fuchsmann, Mout De Vrieze, Katia Gindro, Laure Weisskopf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. GH25 lysozyme mediates tripartite interkingdom interactions and microbial competition on the plant leaf surface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Antifungal and other bioactive properties of the volatilome ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Volatiles fromToxins · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurélie GfellerChangins School of Viticulture and Oenology, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland.
Pascal FuchsmannAgroscope, Nutrition, Sensory Analysis and Flavour Group, 3003 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1013-5657
Mout De VriezeChangins School of Viticulture and Oenology, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-2495
Katia GindroAgroscope, Plant Protection, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland.
Laure WeisskopfChangins School of Viticulture and Oenology, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-3830

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 179310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial volatiles play important roles in mediating beneficial interactions between plants and their associated microbiota. Despite their relevance, bacterial volatiles are mostly studied under laboratory conditions, although these strongly differ from the natural environment bacteria encounter when colonizing plant roots or shoots. In this work, we ask the question whether plant-associated bacteria also emit bioactive volatiles when growing on plant leaves rather than on artificial media. Using four potato-associated

Indexed as

1-undecenebacterial volatile emissiondimethyl disulfidedimethyl trisulfidephyllosphereSolanum tuberosum

Identifiers

PMID35893568
PMCPMC9394277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.