Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893268›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2022

Traits of Complex Thinking: A Bibliometric Review of a Disruptive Construct in Education.

Jose Jaime Baena-Rojas, María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, Diego Mauricio Mazo-Cuervo, Edgar Omar López-Caudana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jose Jaime Baena-RojasInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-4087
María Soledad Ramírez-MontoyaInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Diego Mauricio Mazo-CuervoFundación Universitaria CEIPA, Sabaneta 055450, Colombia.
Edgar Omar López-CaudanaInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-4219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to contextualize the behavior of publications on complex thinking in education. A total of 428 documents compiled in Scopus from 1937 to 2022 were analyzed with a bibliometric study considering criteria such as "complex thinking", "complex thought", and "reasoning for complexity", all combined with education. The results show 153, 47, and 5 publications for each criterion with their related disciplines, citations, types of documents, universities, prominent authors, researching countries, and the general diachronic evolution of the subject, this allows to establish an idea about the implications of the present study according to one of the most important databases in the world. It is concluded that complex thinking and its relationship with education awakens a greater interest in the academy, not only because of its incidence in diverse fields that are nourished by it for the generation of new multidisciplinary knowledge but also because of the published research that demonstrates its transcendence.

Indexed as

bibliometricscomplex thinkingeducational innovationepistemologyhigher education

Identifiers

PMID35893268
PMCPMC9326623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.