Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35893190›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Modeling Coding Intensity of Procedures in a U.S. Population-Based Hip/Knee Arthroplasty Inpatient Cohort Adjusting for Patient- and Facility-Level Characteristics.

Nancy G Rios, Paige E Oldiges, Marcela S Lizano, Danielle S Doucet Wadford, David L Quick, John Martin, Michael Korvink, Laura H Gunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nancy G RiosSchool of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Paige E OldigesSchool of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8860-0999
Marcela S LizanoSchool of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5120-3460
Danielle S Doucet WadfordSchool of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
David L QuickDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
John MartinITS Data Science, Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC 28277, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5217-4980
Michael KorvinkITS Data Science, Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC 28277, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-4293
Laura H GunnSchool of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-4526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variations in procedure coding intensity, defined as excess coding of procedures versus industry (instead of clinical) standards, can result in differentials in quality of care for patients and have additional implications for facilities and payors. The literature regarding coding intensity of procedures is limited, with a need for risk-adjusted methods that help identify over- and under-coding using commonly available data, such as administrative claims. Risk-adjusted metrics are needed for quality control and enhancement. We propose a two-step approach to risk adjustment, using a zero-inflated Poisson model, applied to a hip-knee arthroplasty cohort discharged during 2019 (

Indexed as

coding intensityhip-knee arthroplastyICD-10MS-DRGproceduresrisk adjustment

Identifiers

PMID35893190
PMCPMC9332158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.