ArticleMicromachines2022
Fabrication of Microfluidic Tesla Valve Employing Femtosecond Bursts.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of commercial and laboratory-based microfluidic devices based on glass and/or silicon substrates.RSC advances · 2026Review
- 3D printing of stents via two-photon polymerization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of Process Parameters on Pulsed Laser Micromachining for Glass-Based Microfluidic Devices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy of a Tesla Valve Straw in a Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Exercise in a Normal-Voiced Population.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- Transformation gap from research findings to large-scale commercialized products in microfluidic field.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Supercontinuum generation in bulk solid-state material with bursts of femtosecond laser pulses.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Expansion of the microfluidics field dictates the necessity to constantly improve technologies used to produce such systems. One of the approaches which are used more and more is femtosecond (fs) direct laser writing (DLW). The subtractive model of DLW allows for directly producing microfluidic channels via ablation in an extremely simple and cost-effective manner. However, channel surface roughens are always a concern when direct fs ablation is used, as it normally yields an RMS value in the range of a few µm. One solution to improve it is the usage of fs bursts. Thus, in this work, we show how fs burst mode ablation can be optimized to achieve sub-µm surface roughness in glass channel fabrication. It is done without compromising on manufacturing throughput. Furthermore, we show that a simple and cost-effective channel sealing methodology of thermal bonding can be employed. Together, it allows for production functional Tesla valves, which are tested. Demonstrated capabilities are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.