Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892987›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Zongyan Shen, Ang Qu, Ping Jiang, Yuliang Jiang, Haitao Sun, Junjie Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bi-plane trans-rectal ultrasound (BTRUS) guided prostate perineal template based high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDRIBT) for vaginal vault recurrence.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zongyan ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Ang QuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Ping JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Yuliang JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Haitao SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4734-9683
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recurrence rate of cervical cancer after primary treatment can reach 60%, and a poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Treatment options for the recurrence of cervical cancer mainly depend on the prior treatment regimen and the location of recurrent lesions. Re-irradiation is still considered as a clinical challenge, owing to a high incidence of toxicity, especially in in-field recurrence within a short period of time. Recent advances in radiotherapy have preliminarily revealed encouraging outcomes of re-irradiation. Several centers have concentrasted on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of well-selected cases. Meanwhile, as the image-guiding techniques become more precise, a better dose profile can also be achieved in brachytherapy, including high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) and permanent radioactive seed implantation (PRSI). These treatment modalities have shown promising efficacy with a tolerable toxicity, providing further treatment options for recurrent cervical cancer. However, it is highly unlikely to draw a definite conclusion from all of those studies due to the large heterogeneity among them and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This study mainly reviews and summarizes the progress of re-irradiation for recurrent cervical cancer in recent years, in order to provide potential treatment regimens for the management of re-irradiation.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyRadiosurgeryRe-IrradiationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansProspective Studieshigh-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapypermanent radioactive seed implantationrecurrent cervical cancerre-irradiationstereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID35892987
PMCPMC9331513
OpenAlexW4287838559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.