Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892858›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

A Pilot Study: Favorable Effects of

Jing Cong, Chuantao Zhang, Siyu Zhou, Jingjuan Zhu, Chengwei Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Effect ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing CongCollege of Marine Science and Biological Engineering, Qingdao University of Science &Technology, Qingdao 266042, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-9110
Chuantao ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China.
Siyu ZhouCollege of Marine Science and Biological Engineering, Qingdao University of Science &Technology, Qingdao 266042, China.
Jingjuan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China.
Chengwei LiangCollege of Marine Science and Biological Engineering, Qingdao University of Science &Technology, Qingdao 266042, China.
Qingdao University of Science and Technology · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

CNS-ZD Tizhi and Health Fund CNS-ZD2020-21Key Research and Development Project of Hubei Province 2020BCA081-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics as medications have previously been shown to change intestinal microbial characteristics, potentially influencing cancer therapy efficacy. Patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) treated by bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to obtain Clostridium butyricum supplement (CBS) or receive a placebo as adjuvant therapy. Clinical efficacy and safety were assessed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE). Intestinal microbiota was longitudinally explored between CBS and placebo groups over time. Patients who took CBS had significantly decreased bacterial richness and abundance, as well as increased the total richness of the genus Clostridium, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus compared to the placebo group (p < 0.05). Beta diversity and the interactional network of intestinal microbiota were distinctly different between CBS and placebo group. However, there were no significant variations between them in terms of microbial taxonomical taxa and alpha diversity. The potential opportunistic pathogen Shewanella was still detectable after treatment in the placebo group, while no distinguishing microbial markers were found in the CBS group. In terms of clinical efficacy, the CBS group had a significantly reduced AE compare to the placebo group (p < 0.05), although no significantly longer PFS and OS. Therefore, favorable modifications in intestinal microbiota and significant improvements in drug safety make probiotics be promising adjunctive therapeutic avenues for lung cancer treatment.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentClostridium butyricumeffectsintestinal microbiotaprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID35892858
PMCPMC9332558
OpenAlexW4287010131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.