Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892845›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Potential of Gold Nanoparticle in Current Radiotherapy Using a Co-Culture Model of Cancer Cells and Cancer Associated Fibroblast Cells.

Abdulaziz Alhussan, Nicholas Palmerley, Julian Smazynski, Joanna Karasinska, Daniel J Renouf, David F Schaeffer, Wayne Beckham, Abraham S Alexander, Devika B Chithrani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Shape-Driven Response of Gold Nanoparticles to X-rays.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulaziz AlhussanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-2803
Nicholas PalmerleyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Julian SmazynskiDeeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer-Victoria, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada.
Joanna KarasinskaPancreas Centre BC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada.
Daniel J RenoufPancreas Centre BC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada.
David F SchaefferPancreas Centre BC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada.
Wayne BeckhamDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Abraham S AlexanderRadiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer-Victoria, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada.
Devika B ChithraniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5251-1388
University of Victoria · CAPancreas Centre (Canada) · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cancer therapeutics are tested in vitro using only tumour cells. However, the tumour promoting effect of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) within the tumour microenvironment (TME) is thought to reduce cancer therapeutics' efficacy. We have chosen pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as our tumor model. Our goal is to create a co-culture of CAFs and tumour cells to model the interaction between cancer and stromal cells in the TME and allow for better testing of therapeutic combinations. To test the proposed co-culture model, a gold nanoparticle (GNP) mediated-radiation response was used. Cells were grown in co-culture with different ratios of CAFs to cancer cells. MIA PaCa-2 was used as our PDAC cancer cell line. Co-cultured cells were treated with 2 Gy of radiation following GNP incubation. DNA damage and cell proliferation were examined to assess the combined effect of radiation and GNPs. Cancer cells in co-culture exhibited up to a 23% decrease in DNA double strand breaks (DSB) and up to a 35% increase in proliferation compared to monocultures. GNP/Radiotherapy (RT) induced up to a 25% increase in DNA DSBs and up to a 15% decrease in proliferation compared to RT alone in both monocultured and co-cultured cells. The observed resistance in the co-culture system may be attributed to the role of CAFs in supporting cancer cells. Moreover, we were able to reduce the activity of CAFs using GNPs during radiation treatment. Indeed, CAFs internalize a significantly higher number of GNPs, which may have led to the reduction in their activity. One reason experimental therapeutics fail in clinical trials relates to limitations in the pre-clinical models that lack a true representation of the TME. We have demonstrated a co-culture platform to test GNP/RT in a clinically relevant environment.

Indexed as

cancer associated fibroblastsco-culturegold nanoparticleMIA PaCa-2monoculturenanotechnologypancreatic cancerradiosensitization

Identifiers

PMID35892845
PMCPMC9332249
OpenAlexW4286587701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.