ArticleCancers2022
Designing Organoid Models to Monitor Cancer Progression, Plasticity and Resistance: The Right Set Up for the Right Question.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor organoid-immune cell co-culture systems for precision oncology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Evaluating immune responseExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The recent trend in 3D cell modeling has fostered the emergence of a wide range of models, addressing very distinct goals ranging from the fundamental exploration of cell-cell interactions to preclinical assays for personalized medicine. It is clear that no single model will recapitulate the complexity and dynamics of in vivo situations. The key is to define the critical points, achieve a specific goal and design a model where they can be validated. In this report, we focused on cancer progression. We describe our model which is designed to emulate breast carcinoma progression during the invasive phase. We chose to provide topological clues to the target cells by growing them on microsupports, favoring a polarized epithelial organization before they are embedded in a 3D matrix. We then watched for cell organization and differentiation for these models, adding stroma cells then immune cells to follow and quantify cell responses to drug treatment, including quantifying cell death and viability, as well as morphogenic and invasive properties. We used model cell lines including Comma Dβ, MCF7 and MCF10A mammary epithelial cells as well as primary breast cancer cells from patient-derived xenografts (PDX). We found that fibroblasts impacted cell response to Docetaxel and Palbociclib. We also found that NK92 immune cells could target breast cancer cells within the 3D configuration, providing quantitative monitoring of cell cytotoxicity. We also tested several sources for the extracellular matrix and selected a hyaluronan-based matrix as a promising alternative to mouse tumor basement membrane extracts for primary human cancer cells. Overall, we validated a new 3D model designed for breast cancer for preclinical use in personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.