Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892750›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Contribution to the 3R Principle: Description of a Specimen-Specific Finite Element Model Simulating 3-Point-Bending Tests in Mouse Tibiae.

Xiaowei Huang, Andreas K Nussler, Marie K Reumann, Peter Augat, Maximilian M Menger, Ahmed Ghallab, Jan G Hengstler, Tina Histing, Sabrina Ehnert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Fracture Healing Research.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaowei HuangSiegfried Weller Research Institute, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas K NusslerSiegfried Weller Research Institute, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-6791
Marie K ReumannSiegfried Weller Research Institute, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Peter AugatInstitute for Biomechanics, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria & BG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4805-2128
Maximilian M MengerSiegfried Weller Research Institute, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ahmed GhallabDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), 44139 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0695-3403
Jan G HengstlerDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Tina HistingSiegfried Weller Research Institute, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Sabrina EhnertSiegfried Weller Research Institute, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4347-1702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone mechanical properties are classically determined by biomechanical tests, which normally destroy the bones and disable further histological or molecular analyses. Thus, obtaining biomechanical data from bone usually requires an additional group of animals within the experimental setup. Finite element models (FEMs) may non-invasively and non-destructively simulate mechanical characteristics based on material properties. The present study aimed to establish and validate an FEM to predict the mechanical properties of mice tibiae. The FEM was established based on µCT (micro-Computed Tomography) data of 16 mouse tibiae. For validating the FEM, simulated parameters were compared to biomechanical data obtained from 3-point bending tests of the identical bones. The simulated and the measured parameters correlated well for bending stiffness (R2 = 0.9104, p < 0.0001) and yield displacement (R2 = 0.9003, p < 0.0001). The FEM has the advantage that it preserves the bones’ integrity, which can then be used for other analytical methods. By eliminating the need for an additional group of animals for biomechanical tests, the established FEM can contribute to reducing the number of research animals in studies focusing on bone biomechanics. This is especially true when in vivo µCT data can be utilized where multiple bone scans can be performed with the same animal at different time points. Thus, by partially replacing biomechanical experiments, FEM simulations may reduce the overall number of animals required for an experimental setup investigating bone biomechanics, which supports the 3R (replace, reduce, and refine) principle.

Indexed as

biomechanicsfinite element analysislong bonerodentsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35892750
PMCPMC9331748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.