Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892664›Full record

ReviewAudiology research2022

The Otoprotective Effect of Ear Cryotherapy: Systematic Review and Future Perspectives.

Dominik Péus, Shaumiya Sellathurai, Nicolas Newcomb, Kurt Tschopp, Andreas Radeloff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Audiology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Translational Research in Audiology.Audiology research · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominik PéusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oldenburg, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8204-5285
Shaumiya SellathuraiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Nicolas NewcombDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oldenburg, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany.
Kurt TschoppDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Andreas RadeloffDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oldenburg, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEKantonsspital Baselland · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

Research Fund University Basel 3MS1052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review investigates ear cooling and cryotherapy in the prevention and treatment of inner ear damage and disease, within the context of animal models and clinical studies. A literature search was carried out in the databases Pubmed and Cochrane Library. Ten studies were identified concerning the otoprotective properties of cryotherapy. Nine of these were rodent in vivo studies (mice, rats, gerbils, guinea pigs). One study involved human subjects and investigated cryotherapy in idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss. The studies were heterogeneous in their goals, methods, and the models used. Disorder models included ischemia and noise damage, ototoxicity (cisplatin and aminoglycoside), and CI-electrode insertion. All ten studies demonstrated significant cryotherapeutic otoprotection for their respective endpoints. No study revealed or expressly investigated otodestructive effects. While limited in number, all of the studies within the scope of the review demonstrated some degree of cryotherapeutic, otoprotective effect. These promising results support the conducting of further work to explore and refine the clinical applicability and impact of cryotherpeutics in otolaryngology.

Indexed as

cryotherapyhypothermiainner earotoprotection

Identifiers

PMID35892664
PMCPMC9326667
OpenAlexW4284669519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.