Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892517›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Thousands of Women's Lives Depend on the Improvement of Poland's Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Education as Well as Better Networking Strategies Amongst Cervical Cancer Facilities.

Marcin Śniadecki, Patryk Poniewierza, Paulina Jaworek, Ada Szymańczyk, Gorm Andersson, Maria Stasiak, Michał Brzeziński, Małgorzata Bońkowska, Magdalena Krajewska, Joanna Konarzewska and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcin ŚniadeckiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9587-0476
Patryk PoniewierzaMedical Department, Medicover Sp. z o.o., 00-807 Warsaw, Poland.
Paulina JaworekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Ada SzymańczykDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Gorm AnderssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Maria StasiakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Michał BrzezińskiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, PCK Marine Hospital in Gdynia, 81-519 Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-3465
Małgorzata BońkowskaEmergency Department, University Clinical Center in Gdańsk, 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland.
Magdalena KrajewskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Joanna KonarzewskaDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Dagmara Klasa-MazurkiewiczDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0122-9504
Paweł GuzikClinical Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, City Hospital Rzeszów, 35-241 Rzeszów, Poland.
Dariusz Grzegorz WydraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLGdynia Maritime University · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper targeted cancer prophylaxis reduces the incidence of cancer in all forms; this includes cancers with significant progression potential and poor prognosis. Based on the assumption that one of the risk factors of cervical cancer is the avoidance of screening tests, we analyzed the current scenario of cervical cancer (CC) screening and recommendations in Poland (country with a well-off socioeconomic status). Based on the comprehensive literature review concerning documents of guidelines and recommendations of various bodies, including national ones, data on the implementation of CC screening in Poland, and different models for medium-to-high-income countries, we proposed how the CC screening strategy could be improved. Finally, the new strategy was further developed for those who are prone to not being screened. The proposal on how to improve the Polish CC screening program is the following: refinement of the public education on CC risk factors, popularization of CC screening incentives amongst the public, and improvement of networking strategies between CC screening facilities ("cervical screening clinical"), allowing screenings to be more efficient and rapid. We believe that, to enhance the future quality of life of those with rapid CC progression by catching the disease preemptively and limiting the sequelae of the disease, we have to improve education and access to medical services.

Indexed as

cervical cancereducationprogressionscreening program

Identifiers

PMID35892517
PMCPMC9394414
OpenAlexW4288038692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.