Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892505›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Machine Learning for Anxiety Detection Using Biosignals: A Review.

Lou Ancillon, Mohamed Elgendi, Carlo Menon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Artificial Intelligence-Based Depression Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lou AncillonBiomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Mohamed ElgendiBiomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlo MenonBiomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorder (AD) is a major mental health illness. However, due to the many symptoms and confounding factors associated with AD, it is difficult to diagnose, and patients remain untreated for a long time. Therefore, researchers have become increasingly interested in non-invasive biosignals, such as electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG), electrodermal response (EDA), and respiration (RSP). Applying machine learning to these signals enables clinicians to recognize patterns of anxiety and differentiate a sick patient from a healthy one. Further, models with multiple and diverse biosignals have been developed to improve accuracy and convenience. This paper reviews and summarizes studies published from 2012 to 2022 that applied different machine learning algorithms with various biosignals. In doing so, it offers perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of current developments to guide future advancements in anxiety detection. Specifically, this literature review reveals promising measurement accuracies ranging from 55% to 98% for studies with sample sizes of 10 to 102 participants. On average, studies using only EEG seemed to obtain the best performance, but the most accurate results were obtained with EDA, RSP, and heart rate. Random forest and support vector machines were found to be widely used machine learning methods, and they lead to good results as long as feature selection has been performed. Neural networks are also extensively used and provide good accuracy, with the benefit that no feature selection is needed. This review also comments on the effective combinations of modalities and the success of different models for detecting anxiety.

Indexed as

anxiety biomarkersdigital healthdigital psychological assessmentphysiological measureswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID35892505
PMCPMC9332282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.