Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892494›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

New Generation Express View: An Artificial Intelligence Software Effectively Reduces Capsule Endoscopy Reading Times.

Stefania Piccirelli, Alessandro Mussetto, Angelo Bellumat, Renato Cannizzaro, Marco Pennazio, Alessandro Pezzoli, Alessandra Bizzotto, Nadia Fusetti, Flavio Valiante, Cesare Hassan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefania PiccirelliFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro MussettoOspedale Santa Maria delle Croci, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-4223
Angelo BellumatOspedale di Feltre, 32032 Feltre, Italy.
Renato CannizzaroCentro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-222X
Marco PennazioDivision of Gastroenterology, University City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10121 Turin, Italy.
Alessandro PezzoliEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Sant'Anna University Hospital, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandra BizzottoFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Nadia FusettiEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Sant'Anna University Hospital, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Flavio ValianteOspedale di Feltre, 32032 Feltre, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-4468
Cesare HassanEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Silvia PecereFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4401-7344
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Medicine, Odense University Hospital Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-489X
Cristiano SpadaFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5692-0960
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITOspedale Civile di Giaveno · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReading capsule endoscopy (CE) is time-consuming. The Express View (EV) (IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea) software was designed to shorten CE video reading. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EV in detecting significant small-bowel (SB) lesions. We also compared the reading times with EV mode and standard reading (SR).

methods126 patients with suspected SB bleeding and/or suspected neoplasia were prospectively enrolled and underwent SB CE (MiroCam®1200, IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea). CE evaluation was performed in standard and EV mode. In case of discrepancies between SR and EV readings, a consensus was reached after reviewing the video segments and the findings were re-classified.

resultsThe completion rate of SB CE in our cohort was 86.5% and no retention occurred. The per-patient analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EV compared to SR were 86%, 86%, 90%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, before consensus. After consensus, they increased to 97%, 100%, 100%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. The median reading time with SR and EV was 71 min (range 26−340) and 13 min (range 3−85), respectively (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe new-generation EV shows high diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduces CE reading times.

Indexed as

automatic reading softwarecapsule endoscopyExpress Viewreading time

Identifiers

PMID35892494
PMCPMC9332221
OpenAlexW4286587479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.