Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892428›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Risk of Developing Non-Cancerous Central Nervous System Diseases Due to Ionizing Radiation Exposure during Adulthood: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Julie Lopes, Klervi Leuraud, Dmitry Klokov, Christelle Durand, Marie-Odile Bernier, Clémence Baudin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie LopesLaboratory of Epidemiology (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Klervi LeuraudLaboratory of Epidemiology (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5492-168X
Dmitry KlokovExperimental Radiotoxicology and Radiobiology Laboratory (LRTOX), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1629-1431
Christelle DurandExperimental Radiotoxicology and Radiobiology Laboratory (LRTOX), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Marie-Odile BernierLaboratory of Epidemiology (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Clémence BaudinLaboratory of Epidemiology (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2240-1548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-dose ionizing radiation (IR) (>0.5 Gy) is an established risk factor for cognitive impairments, but this cannot be concluded for low-to-moderate IR exposure (<0.5 Gy) in adulthood as study results are inconsistent. The objectives are to summarize relevant epidemiological studies of low-to-moderate IR exposure in adulthood and to assess the risk of non-cancerous CNS diseases. Methods: A systematic literature search of four electronic databases was performed to retrieve relevant epidemiological studies published from 2000 to 2022. Pooled standardized mortality ratios, relative risks, and excess relative risks (ERR) were estimated with a random effect model. Results: Forty-five publications were included in the systematic review, including thirty-three in the quantitative meta-analysis. The following sources of IR-exposure were considered: atomic bomb, occupational, environmental, and medical exposure. Increased dose-risk relationships were found for cerebrovascular diseases incidence and mortality (ERRpooled per 100 mGy = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.03−0.05; ERRpooled at 100 mGy = 0.01; 95% CI: −0.00−0.02, respectively) and for Parkinson’s disease (ERRpooled at 100 mGy = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.06−0.16); Conclusions: Our findings suggest that adult low-to-moderate IR exposure may have effects on non-cancerous CNS diseases. Further research addressing inherent variation issues is encouraged.

Indexed as

central nervous systemcerebrovascular diseasescognitive disordersepidemiologyionizing radiationmental and behavioral disordersmental healthmeta-analysessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35892428
PMCPMC9331299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.