Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892415›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Patients with Methamphetamine Use Disorder Show Highly Utilized Proactive Inhibitory Control and Intact Reactive Inhibitory Control with Long-Term Abstinence.

Weine Dai, Hui Zhou, Arne Møller, Ping Wei, Kesong Hu, Kezhuang Feng, Jie Han, Qi Li, Xun Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Weine DaiCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-8505
Hui ZhouCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-3711
Arne MøllerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Center, Aarhus University Hospital and CFIN, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0061-2774
Ping WeiBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.
Kesong HuDepartment of Psychology, Lake Superior State University, Sault St. Marie, MI 49783, USA.
Kezhuang FengHebei Female Drug Rehabilitation Center, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Jie HanHebei Female Drug Rehabilitation Center, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Qi LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-9594
Xun LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1366-8926
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCapital Normal University · CNInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNLake Superior State University · US

Funding

Funded by Open Research Fund of the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology N/AKey project of Beijing Education Science Planning, Reevaluation and cognitive training to treat College students with Internet addiction BEAA21046National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFC0800901-Z03National Natural Science Foundation of China 31571161, 31200782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is a chronic brain disorder that involves frequent failures of inhibitory control and relapses into methamphetamine intake. However, it remains unclear whether the impairment of inhibitory control in MUD is proactive, reactive or both. To address this issue, the current study used the conditional stop-signal task to assess proactive and reactive inhibitory control in 35 MUD patients with long-term abstinence and 35 matched healthy controls. The results showed that MUD patients with long-term abstinence had greater preparation costs than healthy controls, but did not differ in performance, implying a less efficient utilization of proactive inhibitory control. In contrast, MUD patients exhibited intact reactive inhibitory control; reactive but not proactive inhibitory control was associated with high sensation seeking in MUD patients with long-term abstinence. These findings suggest that proactive and reactive inhibitory control may be two different important endophenotypes of addiction in MUD patients with long-term abstinence. The current study provides new insight into the uses of proactive and reactive inhibitory control to effectively evaluate and precisely treat MUD patients with long-term abstinence.

Indexed as

methamphetamine use disorderproactive inhibitory controlreactive inhibitory controlsensation seeking

Identifiers

PMID35892415
PMCPMC9394348
OpenAlexW4287009335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.