Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892407›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Endovascular Treatment of ICAS Patients: Targeting Reperfusion Rather than Residual Stenosis.

Tingyu Yi, Alai Zhan, Yanmin Wu, Yimin Li, Xiufen Zheng, Dinglai Lin, Xiaohui Lin, Zhinan Pan, Rongcheng Chen, Mark Parsons and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tingyu YiCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3110-5844
Alai ZhanRadiology Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Yanmin WuCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Yimin LiRadiology Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Xiufen ZhengCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Dinglai LinCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Xiaohui LinCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Zhinan PanCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Rongcheng ChenCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Mark ParsonsDepartment of Neurology and Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
Wenhuo ChenCerebrovascular and Neuro-Intervention Department, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China.
Longting LinDepartment of Neurology and Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
Fujian Medical University · CNThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

National Health commission capacity building and continuing education center GWJJ2021100203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePrevious studies showed that acute reocclusion after endovascular therapy is related to residual stenosis. However, we observed that reperfusion status but not residual stenosis severity is related to acute reocclusion. This study aimed to assess which factor mention above is more likely to be associated with artery reocclusion after endovascular treatment.

methodsThis study included 86 acute ischemic stroke patients who had middle cerebral artery (MCA) atherosclerotic occlusions and received endovascular treatment within 24 h of a stroke. The primary outcomes included intraprocedural reocclusion assessed during endovascular treatment and delayed reocclusion assessed through follow-up angiography.

resultsOf the 86 patients, the intraprocedural reocclusion rate was 7.0% (6/86) and the delayed reocclusion rate was 2.3% (2/86). Regarding intraprocedural occlusion, for patients with severe residual stenosis, patients with successful thrombectomy reperfusion showed a significantly lower rate than unsuccessful thrombectomy reperfusion (0/30 vs. 6/31,

conclusionReperfusion status rather than residual stenosis severity is associated with artery reocclusion after endovascular treatment. Once successful reperfusion was achieved, the reocclusion occurrence was fairly low in MCA atherosclerosis stroke patients, even with severe residual stenosis.

Indexed as

atheroscleroticendovascular treatmentreocclusionresidual stenosis

Identifiers

PMID35892407
PMCPMC9332149
OpenAlexW4286717459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.