ReviewBiomolecules2022
Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer.
Review in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 198 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
198 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 421 citations in OpenAlex.
- Salivary Extracellular Vesicles in Detection of Cancers Other than Head and Neck: A Systematic Review.Cells · 2025Pooled it
- What is the role of circRNAs in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer? A systematic literature review.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Pooled it
- GFAP and UCHL1 in Non-traumatic SAH: The Story thus Far. A Systematic Review of the Literature.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning-based analysis of cancer cell-derived vesicular proteins revealed significant tumor-specificity and predictive potential of extracellular vesicles for cell invasion and proliferation - A meta-analysis.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Pooled it
- Promising reference genes for RT-qPCR normalization in breast tumors and normal adjacent tissues.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring Molecular Signature and Prognostic Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: Insights From Late-Stage, Recurrent, and Metastatic Tumors.Biotechnology and applied biochemistry · 2026Article
- Emerging biomarkers in breast fibroadenoma: implications for differential diagnosis, malignant transformation, and precision medicine.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Toward point-of-care cancer diagnostics: gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric sensors.RSC advances · 2026Review
- The Association Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Histological Tumor Differentiation in Solid Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Bionic Sensors for Small Molecule Detection: Integrating Synthetic Biology, Nanomaterials, and Artificial Intelligence.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Exploring tear biomarkers with shotgun proteomics for retinoblastoma diagnosis: a pilot study.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Peptides as integrative modulators for clinical prognosis and targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Integrative proteomics and metabolomics advance early cancer detection and targeted therapy with emerging technologies and clinical applications.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- LightGBM-guided discovery of mechanistic biomarkers in thyroid cancer: GALNT7 and SKP1P1 emerge as therapeutic targets.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Biological significance, molecular mechanisms and clinical potential of EI24 in cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Cancer cell identification in tissue imaging via phasor map analysis in polarization-resolved two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Nuclear receptor corepressor 1 is a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- miR-4787-3p and miR-581 as predictive biomarkers for fibrosis and prognosis in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Electrochemical Detection of Cancer Biomarkers: From Molecular Sensing to Clinical Translation.Biosensors · 2026Review
138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular cancer biomarkers are any measurable molecular indicator of risk of cancer, occurrence of cancer, or patient outcome. They may include germline or somatic genetic variants, epigenetic signatures, transcriptional changes, and proteomic signatures. These indicators are based on biomolecules, such as nucleic acids and proteins, that can be detected in samples obtained from tissues through tumor biopsy or, more easily and non-invasively, from blood (or serum or plasma), saliva, buccal swabs, stool, urine, etc. Detection technologies have advanced tremendously over the last decades, including techniques such as next-generation sequencing, nanotechnology, or methods to study circulating tumor DNA/RNA or exosomes. Clinical applications of biomarkers are extensive. They can be used as tools for cancer risk assessment, screening and early detection of cancer, accurate diagnosis, patient prognosis, prediction of response to therapy, and cancer surveillance and monitoring response. Therefore, they can help to optimize making decisions in clinical practice. Moreover, precision oncology is needed for newly developed targeted therapies, as they are functional only in patients with specific cancer genetic mutations, and biomarkers are the tools used for the identification of these subsets of patients. Improvement in the field of cancer biomarkers is, however, needed to overcome the scientific challenge of developing new biomarkers with greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.