Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892261›Full record

ReviewSexual and reproductive health matters2021

Reproductive empowerment and contraceptive self-care: a systematic review.

Holly M Burke, Kathleen Ridgeway, Kate Murray, Alexandria Mickler, Reana Thomas, Katie Williams

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holly M BurkeScientist, FHI 360, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health division, Durham, NC, USA. Correspondence: hburke@fhi360.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-5628
Kathleen RidgewayResearch Associate, FHI 360, Health Services Research division, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0839-2830
Kate MurrayResearch Associate, FHI 360, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health division, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5990-0594
Alexandria MicklerProgram Analyst, USAID/Public Health Institute, Office of Population and Reproductive Health, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-3465
Reana ThomasTechnical Officer, FHI 360, Research Utilization division, Durham, NC, USA.
Katie WilliamsMPH Candidate, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-5383

Funding

Emotion regulation, ART adherence, and virologic status among adolescents and young adults living with HIV in ZambiaF31MH128133 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RIDGEWAY, KATHLEEN MARIE · 2021 to 2023
$135k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH128133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contraceptive self-care interventions are a promising approach to improving reproductive health. Reproductive empowerment, the capacity of individuals to achieve their reproductive goals, is recognised as a component of self-care. An improved understanding of the relationship between self-care and empowerment is needed to advance the design, implementation and scale-up of self-care interventions. We conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature published from 2010 through 2020 to assess the relationship between reproductive empowerment and access, acceptability, use or intention to use contraceptive self-care. Our review adheres to PRISMA guidelines and is registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42020205235). A total of 3036 unique records were screened and 37 studies met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries, were cross-sectional and had high risk of bias. Almost half included only women. Over 80% investigated male condoms. All but one study focused on use of self-care. We found positive relationships between condom use self-efficacy and use of/intention to use condoms. We found similar evidence for other self-care contraceptive methods, but the low number of studies and quality of the evidence precludes drawing strong conclusions. Few studies assessed causal relationships between empowerment and self-care, indicating that further research is warranted. Other underexplored areas include research on power with influential groups besides sexual partners, methods other than condoms, and access and acceptability of contraceptive self-care. Research using validated empowerment measures should be conducted in diverse geographies and populations including adolescents and men.

Indexed as

empowermentfamily planningreproductive empowermentself-caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35892261
PMCPMC9336472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.