Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892207›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2022

Artificial light at night reverses monthly foraging pattern under simulated moonlight.

Svenja Tidau, Jack Whittle, Stuart R Jenkins, Thomas W Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Darkening of the Global Ocean.Global change biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Impacts of artificial light at night on the early life history of two ecosystem engineers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Long-term exposure to experimental light affects the ground-dwelling invertebrate community, independent of light spectra.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Svenja TidauSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0336-0450
Jack WhittleSchool of Ocean Sciences, University of Bangor, Menai Bridge LL59 5AB, UK.
Stuart R JenkinsSchool of Ocean Sciences, University of Bangor, Menai Bridge LL59 5AB, UK.
Thomas W DaviesSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence shows that artificial light at night (ALAN) alters biological processes across levels of organization, from cells to communities. Yet, the combined impacts of ALAN and natural sources of night-time illumination remain little explored. This is in part due the lack of accurate simulations of the complex changes moonlight intensity, timing and spectra throughout a single night and lunar cycles in laboratory experiments. We custom-built a novel system to simulate natural patterns of moonlight to test how different ALAN intensities affect predator-prey relationships over the full lunar cycle. Exposure to high intensity ALAN (10 and 50 lx) reversed the natural lunar-guided foraging pattern by the gastropod mesopredator

Indexed as

EcosystemGastropodaAnimalsLightLightingLight PollutionPhotoperiodartificial light at nightforaginglunar biologylunar cyclesmoonlightsensory ecology

Identifiers

PMID35892207
PMCPMC9326264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.