ArticlePhysics reports2021
Physics of the Nuclear Pore Complex: Theory, Modeling and Experiment.
Article in Physics reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-channel automated programmable liquid exchange system enables high-quality sample preparation for super-resolution microscopy.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Article
- Nuclear Mechanotransduction Across the Metastatic Cascade: Decoding Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Cancer Dissemination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The role of phase separation for RNA and protein transport through the nuclear pore complex.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Unraveling dynamics of nuclear pore and chromatin via HS-AFM.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
- Structure, function and assembly of nuclear pore complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Effects of Nanopore Confinement on the Conformational, Dynamical, and Self-Assembly Properties of an FG-Repeat Peptide.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Elucidating the nanoscopic organization and dynamics of the nuclear pore complex.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2025Article
- Viral interference of nucleocytoplasmic transport.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Review
- Effects of Nanopore Confinement on the Conformational, Dynamical, and Self-Assembly Properties of an FG-Repeat Peptide.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrative mapping reveals molecular features underlying the mechanism of nucleocytoplasmic transport.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Nuclear mechanics as a determinant of nuclear pore complex plasticity.Nature cell biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Role of pore dilation in molecular transport through the nuclear pore complex: Insights from polymer scaling theory.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- The TEMPO integrator: accelerating molecular simulations by temporally multiscale force prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Regulating transport efficiency through the nuclear pore complex: The role of binding affinity with FG-Nups.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- Cytoplasmic nucleoporin assemblage: the cellular artwork in physiology and disease.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024Review
- Deciphering the intrinsically disordered characteristics of the FG-Nups through the lens of polymer physics.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024Review
- Coacervate-pore complexes for selective molecular transport and dynamic reconfiguration.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Protein folding and quality control during nuclear transport.Current opinion in cell biology · 2024Review
- Kinetic cooperativity resolves bidirectional clogging within the nuclear pore complex.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hallmark of eukaryotic cells is the nucleus that contains the genome, enclosed by a physical barrier known as the nuclear envelope (NE). On the one hand, this compartmentalization endows the eukaryotic cells with high regulatory complexity and flexibility. On the other hand, it poses a tremendous logistic and energetic problem of transporting millions of molecules per second across the nuclear envelope, to facilitate their biological function in all compartments of the cell. Therefore, eukaryotes have evolved a molecular "nanomachine" known as the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC). Embedded in the nuclear envelope, NPCs control and regulate all the bi-directional transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. NPCs combine high molecular specificity of transport with high throughput and speed, and are highly robust with respect to molecular noise and structural perturbations. Remarkably, the functional mechanisms of NPC transport are highly conserved among eukaryotes, from yeast to humans, despite significant differences in the molecular components among various species. The NPC is the largest macromolecular complex in the cell. Yet, despite its significant complexity, it has become clear that its principles of operation can be largely understood based on fundamental physical concepts, as have emerged from a combination of experimental methods of molecular cell biology, biophysics, nanoscience and theoretical and computational modeling. Indeed, many aspects of NPC function can be recapitulated in artificial mimics with a drastically reduced complexity compared to biological pores. We review the current physical understanding of the NPC architecture and function, with the focus on the critical analysis of experimental studies in cells and artificial NPC mimics through the lens of theoretical and computational models. We also discuss the connections between the emerging concepts of NPC operation and other areas of biophysics and bionanotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.