Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892075›Full record

ArticlePhysics reports2021

Physics of the Nuclear Pore Complex: Theory, Modeling and Experiment.

Bart W Hoogenboom, Loren E Hough, Edward A Lemke, Roderick Y H Lim, Patrick R Onck, Anton Zilman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Structure, function and assembly of nuclear pore complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Viral interference of nucleocytoplasmic transport.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Integrative mapping reveals molecular features underlying the mechanism of nucleocytoplasmic transport.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bart W HoogenboomLondon Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Loren E HoughDepartment of Physics and BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309, United States of America.
Edward A LemkeBiocenter Mainz, Departments of Biology and Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University and Institute of Molecular Biology, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Roderick Y H LimBiozentrum and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Patrick R OnckZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anton ZilmanDepartment of Physics and Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada.

Funding

Molecular dissection of the C-terminal tails of tubulin and the effect of their polyglycylation on binding and microtubule assemblyR35GM119755 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI HOUGH, LOREN E · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hallmark of eukaryotic cells is the nucleus that contains the genome, enclosed by a physical barrier known as the nuclear envelope (NE). On the one hand, this compartmentalization endows the eukaryotic cells with high regulatory complexity and flexibility. On the other hand, it poses a tremendous logistic and energetic problem of transporting millions of molecules per second across the nuclear envelope, to facilitate their biological function in all compartments of the cell. Therefore, eukaryotes have evolved a molecular "nanomachine" known as the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC). Embedded in the nuclear envelope, NPCs control and regulate all the bi-directional transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. NPCs combine high molecular specificity of transport with high throughput and speed, and are highly robust with respect to molecular noise and structural perturbations. Remarkably, the functional mechanisms of NPC transport are highly conserved among eukaryotes, from yeast to humans, despite significant differences in the molecular components among various species. The NPC is the largest macromolecular complex in the cell. Yet, despite its significant complexity, it has become clear that its principles of operation can be largely understood based on fundamental physical concepts, as have emerged from a combination of experimental methods of molecular cell biology, biophysics, nanoscience and theoretical and computational modeling. Indeed, many aspects of NPC function can be recapitulated in artificial mimics with a drastically reduced complexity compared to biological pores. We review the current physical understanding of the NPC architecture and function, with the focus on the critical analysis of experimental studies in cells and artificial NPC mimics through the lens of theoretical and computational models. We also discuss the connections between the emerging concepts of NPC operation and other areas of biophysics and bionanotechnology.

Indexed as

biomimeticcrowdingdiffusionintrinsically disordered proteinsmolecular dynamicsmolecular modellingmultivalencynanochannelsNuclear pore complexstochastic transport

Identifiers

PMID35892075
PMCPMC9306291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.