ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2022
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for management of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in the Management of Pancreatic Tumors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Current Medical Controversies in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Tumor enhancement by magnetic resonance imaging after endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Review
- Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation as a Therapeutic Approach for the Management of Insulinomas and Associated Metastases in Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Review
- EUS-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Pancreatic Neoplasia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advancements in Microwave Ablation Techniques for Managing Pancreatic Lesions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Cancers · 2023Review
- A Review on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) of Pancreatic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Utility of interventional endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors - going beyond surgery. Literature review and experience of a tertiary center.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used to treat various abdominal tumors including pancreatic tumors. Multiple approaches such as laparoscopic, open, and percutaneous have been used for pancreatic tissue ablation. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA has emerged as a new technique for pancreatic tissue ablation. The role of EUS-RFA in management of pancreatic lesions is still not well-established. In this study, our aim is to assess efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA for management of pancreatic lesions. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting EUS-RFA of pancreatic lesions with outcomes of interest. Studies with <5 patients were excluded. Clinical success was defined as symptom resolution, decrease in tumor size, and/or evidence of necrosis on radiologic imaging. Efficacy was assessed by the pooled clinical response rate whereas safety was assessed by the pooled adverse events rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: Ten studies (5 retrospective and 5 prospective) involving 115 patients with 125 pancreatic lesions were included. 152 EUS-RFA procedures were performed. The lesions comprised of 37.6% non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NFNETs), 15.4% were insulinomas, 26.5% were pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), and 19.7% were pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The majority were present in the pancreatic head (40.2%), 38.3% in the body, 11.2% in the tail, and 10.3% in the uncinate process. Pooled overall clinical response rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 82.4-93.7, I Discussion: This study demonstrates that EUS-RFA is an effective treatment modality for pancreatic lesions, especially functional neuroendocrine tumors such as insulinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.