Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892058›Full record

ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2022

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for management of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yazan Fahmawi, Ansh Mehta, Haneen Abdalhadi, Lindsey Merritt, Meir Mizrahi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors - going beyond surgery. Literature review and experience of a tertiary center.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yazan FahmawiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Ansh MehtaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Haneen AbdalhadiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Lindsey MerrittDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Advanced Endoscopy Unit, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Meir MizrahiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Advanced Endoscopy Unit, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
University of South Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used to treat various abdominal tumors including pancreatic tumors. Multiple approaches such as laparoscopic, open, and percutaneous have been used for pancreatic tissue ablation. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA has emerged as a new technique for pancreatic tissue ablation. The role of EUS-RFA in management of pancreatic lesions is still not well-established. In this study, our aim is to assess efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA for management of pancreatic lesions. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting EUS-RFA of pancreatic lesions with outcomes of interest. Studies with <5 patients were excluded. Clinical success was defined as symptom resolution, decrease in tumor size, and/or evidence of necrosis on radiologic imaging. Efficacy was assessed by the pooled clinical response rate whereas safety was assessed by the pooled adverse events rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: Ten studies (5 retrospective and 5 prospective) involving 115 patients with 125 pancreatic lesions were included. 152 EUS-RFA procedures were performed. The lesions comprised of 37.6% non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NFNETs), 15.4% were insulinomas, 26.5% were pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), and 19.7% were pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The majority were present in the pancreatic head (40.2%), 38.3% in the body, 11.2% in the tail, and 10.3% in the uncinate process. Pooled overall clinical response rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 82.4-93.7, I Discussion: This study demonstrates that EUS-RFA is an effective treatment modality for pancreatic lesions, especially functional neuroendocrine tumors such as insulinomas.

Indexed as

insulinomasnon-resectable pancreatic tumorspancreatic neuroendocrine tumorspancreatic tumorsRadiofrequency ablation (RFA)

Identifiers

PMID35892058
PMCPMC9257535
OpenAlexW3049637672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.