Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892046›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Butterfly glioblastoma: Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes in a population-based cohort.

Line Sagerup Bjorland, Kathinka Dæhli Kurz, Øystein Fluge, Bjørnar Gilje, Rupavathana Mahesparan, Hege Sætran, Anastasia Ushakova, Elisabeth Farbu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Line Sagerup BjorlandDepartment of Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-7804
Kathinka Dæhli KurzStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory (SMIL), Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Øystein FlugeDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Bjørnar GiljeDepartment of Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Rupavathana MahesparanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hege SætranDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Anastasia UshakovaBiostatistics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Elisabeth FarbuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Butterfly glioblastoma is a rare subgroup of glioblastoma with a bihemispheric tumor crossing the corpus callosum, and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Prognostic factors are previously sparsely described and optimal treatment remains uncertain. We aimed to analyze clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes from butterfly glioblastoma in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study included patients diagnosed with butterfly glioblastoma in Western Norway between 01/01/2007 and 31/12/2014. We enrolled patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma and patients with a diagnosis based on a typical MRI pattern. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Molecular and MRI volumetric analyses were retrospectively performed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Among 381 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, 33 patients (8.7%) met the butterfly glioblastoma criteria. Median overall survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.1-7.9) and 3-year survival was 9.1%. Hypofractionated radiation therapy with or without temozolomide was the most frequently used treatment strategy, given to 16 of the 27 (59.3%) patients receiving radiation therapy. Best supportive care was associated with poorer survival compared with multimodal treatment [adjusted hazard ratio 5.11 (95% CI 1.09-23.89)]. Conclusion: Outcome from butterfly glioblastoma was dismal, with a median overall survival of less than 6 months. However, long-term survival was comparable to that observed in non-butterfly glioblastoma, and multimodal treatment was associated with longer survival. This suggests that patients with butterfly glioblastoma may benefit from a more aggressive treatment approach despite the overall poor prognosis.

Indexed as

3D volumetricbihemispheric gliomabutterfly glioblastomaclinical outcomessurvival

Identifiers

PMID35892046
PMCPMC9307095
OpenAlexW4283739532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.