ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2022
High-density neural recording system design.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- LFP-LOC: an LFP power-based method for validating the anatomical placement of high-density neural probes in rodents.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Compact Low-Power Chopper Low Noise Amplifier for High Density Neural Front-Ends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Power-to-Noise Optimization in the Design of Neural Recording Amplifier Based on Current Scaling, Source Degeneration Resistor, and Current Reuse.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Flexible high-density microelectrode arrays for closed-loop brain-machine interfaces: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable medical devices capable of monitoring hundreds to thousands of electrodes have received great attention in biomedical applications for understanding of the brain function and to treat brain diseases such as epilepsy, dystonia, and Parkinson's disease. Non-invasive neural recording modalities such as fMRI and EEGs were widely used since the 1960s, but to acquire better information, invasive modalities gained popularity. Since such invasive neural recording system requires high efficiency and low power operation, they have been implemented as integrated circuits. Many techniques have been developed and applied when designing integrated high-density neural recording architecture for better performance, higher efficiency, and lower power consumption. This paper covers general knowledge of neural signals and frequently used neural recording architectures for monitoring neural activity. For neural recording architecture, various neural recording amplifier structures are covered. In addition, several neural processing techniques, which can optimize the neural recording system, are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.