Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35892000›Full record

ArticleKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2022

Computed tomography-guided lung biopsy for molecular tests: a meta-analysis.

Jian-Hua Zhang, Feng-Fei Xia, Xiao-Shan Yang, Yu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules performed with and without the coaxial technique.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian-Hua ZhangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Fengjie People's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Feng-Fei XiaDepartment of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China.
Xiao-Shan YangDepartment of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China.
Yu LiDepartment of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy has been widely used for molecular testing. Aim: To evaluate the potential clinical effectiveness of computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy in molecular tests. Material and methods: We searched the related studies from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until July 2021. The endpoints included adequacy rates for molecular tests, positive rates of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation, and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations. Results: Initially, we were able to identify 1783 potentially relevant studies, among which only 12 were ultimately included in the present meta-analysis. All the studies were retrospective in nature. A total of 2559 patients underwent CT-guided lung biopsy and 1414 of them received molecular testing. We found that the pooled adequacy rate for molecular tests, positive rate of EGFR mutations, and positive rate of ALK translocation were 95%, 49%, and 7%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of adequacy rate for molecular tests ( Conclusions: CT-guided lung biopsy can serve as an effective method to provide sufficient lung cancer samples for molecular testing. The EGFR gene was found to be the most frequently mutated during the analysis.

Indexed as

computed tomographylung biopsymeta-analysismolecular tests

Identifiers

PMID35892000
PMCPMC9290401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.