ReviewJMIR dermatology
Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review.
Review in JMIR dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Skin Checks for Skin Cancer Screening-An Audit of the Triage Performance of DermScreen.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Validation of a Dermatology-Focused Multimodal Image-and-Data Assistant in Diagnosis and Management of Common Dermatologic Conditions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Community-Based Teledermatology for Urgent Suspected Skin Cancer: Health Economic Cost-Comparison and Discrete Event Simulation Study.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Review
- Automated Quantification of Shedding Hairs from Smartphone Photographs Using an AI Tool for Alopecia Monitoring.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Operationalizing a Hub-and-Spoke Telemedicine Model for Mpox Surveillance in a High-Alert, Zero-Prevalence Setting: An Observational Study, Real-World Experience From Iran.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Validation of the Dermatologic Complexity Score for Dermatologic Triage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Closing the AI generalisation gap by adjusting for dermatology condition distribution differences across clinical settings.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Reliability and Accuracy of Inpatient Teledermatology in Asian Patients.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
- Developing and evaluating a mobile-based teledermatology system for skin lesion diagnosis in Iran.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Implementation of a Web-Based Outpatient Asynchronous Consultation Service: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Differences Between Patient and Clinician-Taken Images: Implications for Virtual Care of Skin Conditions.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- The Value of Teledermatology Advice for Skin Toxicity in Oncology: Experience From a Pilot Study.JMIR dermatology · 2024Article
- Implementation and Impact of a Dermoscopy-Enabled Dermatology eConsult Application in Primary Care.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology uses electronically stored information, including patient photographs and demographic information, for clinical decision-making asynchronous to the patient encounter. The integration of SAF teledermatology into clinical practice has been increasing in recent years, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this growth, data regarding the outcomes of SAF teledermatology are limited. A key distinction among current literature involves comparing the quality and utility of images obtained by patients and trained clinicians, as these metrics may vary by the clinical expertise of the photographer. Objective: This narrative literature review aimed to characterize the outcomes of SAF teledermatology through the lens of patient- versus clinician-initiated photography and highlight important future directions for and challenges of the field. Methods: A literature search of peer-reviewed research was performed between February and April 2021. Key search terms included Results: Image quality and diagnostic concordance are generally lower and more variable with patient-submitted images, which may impact their decision-making utility. SAF teledermatology can improve the efficiency of and access to care when photographs are taken by either clinicians or patients. The clinical outcomes of clinician-submitted images are comparable to those of in-person visits in the few studies that have investigated these outcomes. Coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, asynchronous teledermatology helped minimize unnecessary in-person visits in the outpatient setting, as many uncomplicated conditions could be adequately managed remotely via images captured by patients and referring clinicians. For the inpatient setting, SAF teledermatology minimized unnecessary contact during dermatology consultations, although current studies are limited by the heterogeneity of their outcomes. Conclusions: In general, photographs taken by trained clinicians are higher quality and have better and more relevant diagnostic and clinical outcomes. SAF teledermatology helped clinicians avoid unnecessary physical contact with patients in the outpatient and inpatient settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asynchronous teledermatology will likely play a greater role in the future as SAF images become integrated into synchronous teledermatology workflows. However, the obstacles summarized in this review should be addressed before its widespread implementation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.