Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891947›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Neutralising antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 omicron among elderly nursing home residents following a booster dose of BNT162b2 vaccine: A community-based, prospective, longitudinal cohort study.

Timothée Bruel, Laurie Pinaud, Laura Tondeur, Delphine Planas, Isabelle Staropoli, Françoise Porrot, Florence Guivel-Benhassine, Mikaël Attia, Stéphane Pelleau, Tom Woudenberg and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Estimated protection against COVID-19 based on predicted neutralisation titres from multiple antibody measurements in a longitudinal cohort, France, April 2020 to November 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Timothée BruelVirus & Immunity Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Paris, France.
Laurie PinaudEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Laura TondeurEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Delphine PlanasVirus & Immunity Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Paris, France.
Isabelle StaropoliVirus & Immunity Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Paris, France.
Françoise PorrotVirus & Immunity Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Paris, France.
Florence Guivel-BenhassineVirus & Immunity Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Paris, France.
Mikaël AttiaMolecular Genetics of RNA Viruses Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Stéphane PelleauInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Analytics Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Tom WoudenbergInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Analytics Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Cécile DuruHôpital de Crépy-en-Valois, Crépy-en-Valois, France.
Aymar Davy KoffiHôpital de Crépy-en-Valois, Crépy-en-Valois, France.
Sandrine CastelainLaboratoire de virologie, CHU Amiens, AGIR UR4294, UPJV, Amiens, France.
Sandrine Fernandes-PellerinCentre for Translational Science, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Nathalie JollyCentre for Translational Science, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Louise Perrin De FacciClinical Investigation and access to bioresources (ICAReB) platform, Centre for Translational Science, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Emmanuel RouxClinical Investigation and access to bioresources (ICAReB) platform, Centre for Translational Science, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Marie-Noëlle UngeheuerClinical Investigation and access to bioresources (ICAReB) platform, Centre for Translational Science, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Sylvie Van Der WerfMolecular Genetics of RNA Viruses Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Michael WhiteInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Analytics Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Olivier SchwartzVirus & Immunity Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Paris, France.
Arnaud FontanetEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgents infectieux, résistance et chimiothérapie · FRConservatoire National des Arts et Métiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The protective immunity against omicron following a BNT162b2 Pfizer booster dose among elderly individuals (ie, those aged >65 years) is not well characterised. Methods: In a community-based, prospective, longitudinal cohort study taking place in France in which 75 residents from three nursing homes were enrolled, we selected 38 residents who had received a two-dose regimen of mRNA vaccine and a booster dose of Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. We excluded individuals that did not receive three vaccine doses or did not have available sera samples. We measured anti-S IgG antibodies and neutralisation capacity in sera taken 56 (28-68) and 55 (48-64) days (median (range)) after the 2 Findings: Among the 38 elderly individuals recruited to the cohort study between November 23 Interpretation: This study shows that elderly individuals who received three vaccine doses elicit neutralising antibodies against the omicron BA.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2. Elderly individuals who had also been previously infected showed higher neutralising activity compared with naive individuals. Yet, breakthrough infections with omicron occurred. Individuals with breakthrough infections had significantly lower neutralising titers compared to individuals without breakthrough infection. Thus, a fourth dose of vaccine may be useful in the elderly population to increase the level of neutralising antibodies and compensate for waning immunity. Funding: Institut Pasteur, Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM), European Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA), Agence nationale de recherches sur le sida et les hépatites virales - Maladies Infectieuses Emergentes (ANRS-MIE), Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR), Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) and Fondation de France.

Indexed as

AntibodiesElderly individualsOmicronSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35891947
PMCPMC9307278
OpenAlexW4286615180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.